<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DigiCom &#187; Samsung</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digicomgroup.com/tag/samsung/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com</link>
	<description>digital digest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:31:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>EU probes Samsung over mobile phone patents</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2012/01/13/2040/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2012/01/13/2040/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=2040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The European Union&#8217;s antitrust watchdog says it&#160;is probing whether Samsung Electronics has&#160;illegally prevented competitors from using key&#160;patents on&#160;mobile phones. The European Commission said Tuesday it&#160;suspects Samsung of&#160;not giving other companies fair access to&#160;patents it&#160;holds on&#160;standardized technology for&#160;mobile phones , despite committing to&#160;do so&#160;in 1998. The Commission said that Samsung last year sought legal injunctions against [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The European Union&#8217;s antitrust watchdog says it&nbsp;is probing whether Samsung Electronics has&nbsp;illegally prevented competitors from using key&nbsp;patents on&nbsp;mobile phones.<span id="more-2040"></span></p>
<p>The European Commission said Tuesday it&nbsp;suspects Samsung of&nbsp;not giving other companies fair access to&nbsp;patents it&nbsp;holds on&nbsp;standardized technology for&nbsp;mobile phones , despite committing to&nbsp;do so&nbsp;in 1998.</p>
<p>The Commission said that Samsung last year sought legal injunctions against other device makers in&nbsp;several EU&nbsp;states, alleging patent infringement.</p>
<p>The probe comes just as&nbsp;Samsung is&nbsp;locked in&nbsp;a battle with Apple over whether its&nbsp;Galaxy tablet too&nbsp;closely resembles the&nbsp;iPad.</p>
<p>A spokesman for&nbsp;the Commission couldn&#8217;t immediately say&nbsp;whether the&nbsp;patents also affect tablet computers.</p>
<p>THIS IS&nbsp;A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for&nbsp;further information. AP&#8217;s earlier story is&nbsp;below.</p>
<p>BERLIN (AP) , A&nbsp;German appeals court has&nbsp;upheld a&nbsp;decision prohibiting Samsung Electronics Co. from selling two&nbsp;of its&nbsp;tablet computers in&nbsp;Germany, agreeing with Apple Inc. that they too&nbsp;closely resemble the&nbsp;iPad2.</p>
<p>The Duesseldorf state court ruled Tuesday that neither the&nbsp;South Korean company&#8217;s Galaxy Tab&nbsp;10,1 nor&nbsp;the Galaxy Tab&nbsp;8,9 could be&nbsp;sold in&nbsp;Germany because they were in&nbsp;violation of&nbsp;unfair competition laws.</p>
<p>But it&nbsp;said the&nbsp;successor Galaxy Tab&nbsp;10,1 N&nbsp;is not&nbsp;affected by&nbsp;the ruling.</p>
<p>The ruling comes as&nbsp;part of&nbsp;a string of&nbsp;court battles between California-based Apple and&nbsp;Samsung over their tablet computers. In&nbsp;December, a&nbsp;Sydney court ruled that Samsung could sell its&nbsp;Galaxy tablet computers in&nbsp;Australia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2012/01/13/2040/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Vows to&#160;Become Leader on&#160;Cell Phone Market in&#160;2012.</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/12/20/1935/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/12/20/1935/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 21:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=1935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nokia Corp. is&#160;still the&#160;largest maker of&#160;mobile phones in&#160;the world even after a&#160;massively unlucky year 2011, when the&#160;company lost smartphone leadership to&#160;Apple and&#160;Samsung Electronics. But&#160;this is&#160;only the&#160;beginning. Samsung claims that this year it&#160;will become the&#160;absolutely biggest supplier of&#160;cell phones on&#160;the planet. Samsung chief executive Choi Gee-sung told reporters during his&#160;speech at&#160;the Consumer Electronics Show, that the&#160;company [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nokia Corp. is&nbsp;still the&nbsp;largest maker of&nbsp;mobile phones in&nbsp;the world even after a&nbsp;massively unlucky year 2011, when the&nbsp;company lost smartphone leadership to&nbsp;Apple and&nbsp;Samsung Electronics. But&nbsp;this is&nbsp;only the&nbsp;beginning. Samsung claims that this year it&nbsp;will become the&nbsp;absolutely biggest supplier of&nbsp;cell phones on&nbsp;the planet.<span id="more-1935"></span></p>
<p>Samsung chief executive Choi Gee-sung told reporters during his&nbsp;speech at&nbsp;the Consumer Electronics Show, that the&nbsp;company overtook Nokia in&nbsp;revenue terms in&nbsp;its latest reported quarter and&nbsp;was confident of&nbsp;topping the&nbsp;Finnish group in&nbsp;shipments this year. Although the&nbsp;popularity of&nbsp;Nokia phones is&nbsp;declining, the&nbsp;company is&nbsp;still very strong on&nbsp;emerging markets. Besides, the&nbsp;company has&nbsp;started selling its&nbsp;next-generation smartphones powered by&nbsp;Microsoft Windows Phone 7,5 &laquo;Mango&raquo; operating system and&nbsp;they can&nbsp;slowdown Nokia&#8217;s declines in&nbsp;case the&nbsp;two partners manage to&nbsp;improve popularity of&nbsp;WP7,5 platform compared to&nbsp;Apple iOS&nbsp;or Google Android .</p>
<p>According to&nbsp;the latest polls by&nbsp;Reuters news-agency, Nokia was&nbsp;expected to&nbsp;sell 418&nbsp;million phones in&nbsp;2011, versus Samsung&#8217;s 320&nbsp;million. The&nbsp;gap would narrow this year to&nbsp;388 million versus 359&nbsp;million.</p>
<p>&laquo;Samsung is&nbsp;getting closer to&nbsp;Nokia very quickly. Their smartphones strategy has&nbsp;proven right and&nbsp;on feature phones they are&nbsp;growing fast in&nbsp;emerging markets too. Samsung became a&nbsp;recognized brand and&nbsp;their successful smartphones are&nbsp;helping their feature phones business in&nbsp;regions where smartphones are&nbsp;still too&nbsp;expensive,&#8221; said Francisco Jeronimo, an&nbsp;analyst with IDC.</p>
<p>Analysts believe that with slowing sales in&nbsp;well-developed countries, it&nbsp;will be&nbsp;harder for&nbsp;Samsung to&nbsp;outsell Nokia as&nbsp;the company&#8217;s stronghold has&nbsp;historically been emerging markets.</p>
<p>&laquo;Considering how&nbsp;strong Nokia still is&nbsp;in the&nbsp;emerging markets, Samsung&#8217;s expectation seems to&nbsp;imply that Nokia will miserably fail in&nbsp;mature markets. I&nbsp;think it&nbsp;will be&nbsp;hard for&nbsp;Samsung to&nbsp;beat Nokia without more aggressively targeting emerging markets,&#8221; said Carolina Milanesi, an&nbsp;analyst with Gartner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/12/20/1935/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung reveals Galaxy S&#160;WiFi 3,6 music player</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/08/23/1598/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/08/23/1598/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy S WiFi 3.6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=1598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsung has&#160;announced a&#160;new portable media player called the&#160;Samsung Galaxy S&#160;WiFi 3.6. It&#160;follows after a&#160;long list of&#160;IFA 2011 announcements this morning from the&#160;South Korean company but&#160;doesn’t fall into the&#160;smartphone or&#160;tablet category. Instead, it&#160;appears to&#160;simply be&#160;a 3,6-inch addition to&#160;Samsung’s existing 4- and&#160;5-inch Galaxy S&#160;Players. The Galaxy S&#160;WiFi 3,6 falls into the&#160;same strange category as&#160;the iPod touch, that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung has&nbsp;announced a&nbsp;new portable media player called the&nbsp;Samsung Galaxy S&nbsp;WiFi 3.6. It&nbsp;follows after a&nbsp;long list of&nbsp;IFA 2011 announcements this morning from the&nbsp;South Korean company but&nbsp;doesn’t fall into the&nbsp;smartphone or&nbsp;tablet category. Instead, it&nbsp;appears to&nbsp;simply be&nbsp;a 3,6-inch addition to&nbsp;Samsung’s existing 4- and&nbsp;5-inch Galaxy S&nbsp;Players.<span id="more-1598"></span></p>
<p>The Galaxy S&nbsp;WiFi 3,6 falls into the&nbsp;same strange category as&nbsp;the iPod touch, that offers almost all&nbsp;the same apps and&nbsp;multimedia capabilities of&nbsp;a smartphone and&nbsp;looks like a&nbsp;smartphone, but&nbsp;can’t actually make any&nbsp;phone calls. This perhaps appeals to&nbsp;those that want a&nbsp;dedicated media playing device that’s more affordable and&nbsp;won’t require an&nbsp;attached wireless contract.</p>
<p>It features a&nbsp;3,6-inch 480×800 resolution display, a&nbsp;1GHz TI&nbsp;OMAP processor, a&nbsp;VGA front-facing camera, and&nbsp;a 3-megapixel rear-facing camera. There are&nbsp;clear cost-cutting choices made here with the&nbsp;lower-resolution cameras and&nbsp;the non-AMOLED display. The&nbsp;device is&nbsp;already priced for&nbsp;the UK&nbsp;at £149 ($242) for&nbsp;the 8&nbsp;GB model and&nbsp;£169 ($274) for&nbsp;the 16&nbsp;GB model. No&nbsp;pricing or&nbsp;availability has&nbsp;been confirmed yet&nbsp;for the&nbsp;US.</p>
<p>Samsung made several other major announcements this morning, including the&nbsp;Galaxy Tab&nbsp;7,7 and&nbsp;an unexpected Galaxy Note that straddles both the&nbsp;smartphone and&nbsp;tablet categories with its&nbsp;5,3-inch screen. Make sure to&nbsp;check out&nbsp;our Samsung IFA&nbsp;2011 wrap-up. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/08/23/1598/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Secret Smartphone Weapon: LTE</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/08/15/1566/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/08/15/1566/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=1566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Word broke Thursday afternoon that Verizon Wireless won&#8217;t sell Samsung&#8217;s Galaxy S&#160;II smartphone. The&#160;S II, which was&#160;announced earlier this year, is&#160;a superphone touting high-end specs and&#160;power aplenty. AT&#038;T, Sprint, and&#160;T-Mobile will sell their own&#160;variants of&#160;the Galaxy S&#160;II, all&#160;of which are&#160;expected to&#160;be unveiled at&#160;an event scheduled to&#160;take place Monday, August 29, in&#160;New York City (hurricane permitting). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word broke Thursday afternoon that Verizon Wireless won&#8217;t sell Samsung&#8217;s Galaxy S&nbsp;II smartphone. The&nbsp;S II, which was&nbsp;announced earlier this year, is&nbsp;a superphone touting high-end specs and&nbsp;power aplenty. AT&#038;T, Sprint, and&nbsp;T-Mobile will sell their own&nbsp;variants of&nbsp;the Galaxy S&nbsp;II, all&nbsp;of which are&nbsp;expected to&nbsp;be unveiled at&nbsp;an event scheduled to&nbsp;take place Monday, August 29, in&nbsp;New York City (hurricane permitting).<span id="more-1566"></span></p>
<p>Verizon didn&#8217;t provide a&nbsp;reason for&nbsp;skipping out&nbsp;on the&nbsp;Galaxy S&nbsp;II beyond a&nbsp;cryptic note from a&nbsp;spokesperson noting its&nbsp;current lineup of&nbsp;Samsung devices. Verizon did&nbsp;sell the&nbsp;original Galaxy S&nbsp;along with its&nbsp;network operator competitors, so&nbsp;this development is&nbsp;at least worth paying attention to. Here&#8217;s why. </p>
<p>Samsung slipped up&nbsp;again. This time, a&nbsp;Samsung-managed site revealed details of&nbsp;two devices being announced next week at&nbsp;the IFA&nbsp;event in&nbsp;Berlin. One&nbsp;of the&nbsp;devices is&nbsp;a tablet, the&nbsp;second is&nbsp;a smartphone. One&nbsp;characteristic shared by&nbsp;both is&nbsp;their support for&nbsp;Long Term Evolution 4G.</p>
<p>Some of&nbsp;the details about this smartphone, which were published by&nbsp;ThisIsMyNext, include a&nbsp;4,5-inch display, an&nbsp;1850mAh battery, NFC, 1,5-GHz dual-core processor, an&nbsp;8-megapixel camera, and&nbsp;multi-mode LTE, which will allow the&nbsp;device to&nbsp;work in&nbsp;multiple countries. According to&nbsp;Samsung, this new&nbsp;device will also be&nbsp;called the&nbsp;Samsung Galaxy S&nbsp;II, despite the&nbsp;difference in&nbsp;screen size compared to&nbsp;the original set&nbsp;of Galaxy S&nbsp;II devices.</p>
<p>    IT&nbsp;must operate as&nbsp;a business within a&nbsp;business&nbsp;&#8212; providing resources to&nbsp;the company&nbsp;&#8212; in&nbsp;order to&nbsp;get dollars they need.<br />
    Review seven steps to&nbsp;aligning IT&nbsp;with the&nbsp;business. </p>
<p>Circling back to&nbsp;Verizon, there&#8217;s one&nbsp;big reason it&nbsp;may not&nbsp;want to&nbsp;participate in&nbsp;the big&nbsp;Galaxy S&nbsp;II love-fest planned for&nbsp;next week: It&nbsp;has a&nbsp;LTE smartphone to&nbsp;announce, and&nbsp;doesn&#8217;t want to&nbsp;share the&nbsp;spotlight with its&nbsp;carrier competitors.</p>
<p>Think about it. Verizon Wireless has&nbsp;not actually announced any&nbsp;new LTE&nbsp;smartphones since CES&nbsp;in January. Sure, the&nbsp;Thunderbolt, Charge, Revolution, and&nbsp;Bionic (still to&nbsp;come) have all&nbsp;been released in&nbsp;stages throughout the&nbsp;year, but&nbsp;Verizon and&nbsp;its partners haven&#8217;t introduced brand new&nbsp;hardware in&nbsp;nearly nine months. </p>
<p>Surely, Verizon would want any&nbsp;new LTE&nbsp;smartphone to&nbsp;get its&nbsp;own stage. With reports of&nbsp;an LTE-enabled Galaxy S&nbsp;II in&nbsp;the wings, it&nbsp;is probable that Verizon will eventually sell this new, LTE-equipped version rather than the&nbsp;one being announced by&nbsp;AT&#038;T, Sprint, and&nbsp;T-Mobile next week.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also the&nbsp;Nexus Prime to&nbsp;consider. Most reports that have circulated about the&nbsp;device so&nbsp;far point to&nbsp;a release on&nbsp;Verizon&#8217;s network. The&nbsp;Nexus Prime will be&nbsp;the next reference Android device, probably running Android 4,0 Ice&nbsp;Cream Sandwich. This device deserves its&nbsp;own spotlight. It&nbsp;is possible that Verizon is&nbsp;waiting to&nbsp;announce this device at&nbsp;a separate event/time with Google.</p>
<p>Obviously, none of&nbsp;the details are&nbsp;concrete, but&nbsp;they provide the&nbsp;best picture we&nbsp;have at&nbsp;the moment of&nbsp;what&#8217;s to&nbsp;come with respect to&nbsp;Samsung&#8217;s Android smartphones.</p>
<p>Attend Enterprise 2,0 Santa Clara, Nov. 14&#8212;17, 2011, and&nbsp;learn how&nbsp;to drive business value with collaboration, with an&nbsp;emphasis on&nbsp;how real customers are&nbsp;using social software to&nbsp;enable more productive workforces and&nbsp;to be&nbsp;more responsive and&nbsp;engaged with customers and&nbsp;business partners. Register today and&nbsp;save 30% off&nbsp;conference passes, or&nbsp;get a&nbsp;free expo pass with priority code CPHCES02. Find out&nbsp;more and&nbsp;regi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/08/15/1566/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Powered Netbook Coming From Samsung</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/07/06/1433/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/07/06/1433/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 09:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar-powered]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=1433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Summer is&#160;in full swing and, wouldn’t you&#160;know it, here comes the&#160;July 4th&#160;holiday. This weekend, all&#160;across the&#160;U.S., patriotism, BBQs, beer and, of&#160;course, fireworks can&#160;be expected. What else can&#160;be expected this weekend? An&#160;eco-friendly, solar-powered netbook from Samsung. We learned of&#160;the new&#160;netbook’s pending arrival in&#160;the U.S., Russia and&#160;Africa from the&#160;folks at&#160;liliputing. It&#160;turns out&#160;that the&#160;NC215s, hailed as&#160;the world’s first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Summer is&nbsp;in full swing and, wouldn’t you&nbsp;know it, here comes the&nbsp;July 4th&nbsp;holiday. This weekend, all&nbsp;across the&nbsp;U.S., patriotism, BBQs, beer and, of&nbsp;course, fireworks can&nbsp;be expected. What else can&nbsp;be expected this weekend? An&nbsp;eco-friendly, solar-powered netbook from Samsung.<span id="more-1433"></span></p>
<p>We learned of&nbsp;the new&nbsp;netbook’s pending arrival in&nbsp;the U.S., Russia and&nbsp;Africa from the&nbsp;folks at&nbsp;liliputing. It&nbsp;turns out&nbsp;that the&nbsp;NC215s, hailed as&nbsp;the world’s first solar-powered netbook, is, in&nbsp;fact, reportedly due&nbsp;to hit&nbsp;U.S. shelves on&nbsp;July 3rd&nbsp;for around $400.</p>
<p>According to&nbsp;the manufacturer, the&nbsp;solar panel, which is&nbsp;mounted on&nbsp;the reverse side of&nbsp;the NC215s’  flip-up display, is&nbsp;able to&nbsp;provide about an&nbsp;hour of&nbsp;computing time for&nbsp;every two&nbsp;hours it&nbsp;spends in&nbsp;direct sunlight. The&nbsp;netbook is&nbsp;said to&nbsp;sport a&nbsp;battery that can&nbsp;provide up&nbsp;to 14,5 hours of&nbsp;operating time, though graphics intensive use&nbsp;is likely to&nbsp;knock that number down several notches. The&nbsp;computer features an&nbsp;Intel Atom &#8470;&nbsp;570 1,66 GHz&nbsp;dual-core  processor with integrated graphics that draws a&nbsp;maximum of&nbsp;8,5 watts (actually on&nbsp;the high side for&nbsp;an Atom processor). Adding to&nbsp;the computer’s eco-friendliness factor is&nbsp;its recyclable parts.</p>
<p>The  netbook includes a&nbsp;list of&nbsp;other interesting and&nbsp;practical features. A&nbsp; &laquo;Sleep-and-Charge&raquo; USB&nbsp;port that can&nbsp;charge mobile devices even while the&nbsp;netbook is&nbsp;in sleep mode or&nbsp;turned completely off&nbsp;can also provide juice once battery power is&nbsp;depleted using its&nbsp;built in&nbsp;solar panel. The&nbsp;computer’s 10,1″ display has&nbsp;a matte finish to&nbsp;reduce glare and&nbsp;Samsung reports that it&nbsp;is 50% brighter than competing netbooks, leading us&nbsp;to believe it&nbsp;may actually be&nbsp;usable while sitting out&nbsp;in the&nbsp;sun. No&nbsp;word, however, on&nbsp;how Samsung mitigates the&nbsp;heat issue that often crops up&nbsp;when such devices spend considerable time under blistering solar rays. We’ll just have to&nbsp;wait and&nbsp;see.</p>
<p>Did you&nbsp;know EarthTechling writes about all&nbsp;manner of&nbsp;green gadgets? Check out&nbsp;more on&nbsp;this topic here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/07/06/1433/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar-powered laptop launched by Samsung</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/05/28/1387/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/05/28/1387/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 14:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar-powered]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=1387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new&#160;laptop from Samsung incorporates a&#160;solar panel into the&#160;lid and&#160;could offer battery life of&#160;up to&#160;14,5 hours&#160;&#8212; but&#160;it’s initially only available in&#160;Russia A new&#160;laptop to&#160;be launched in&#160;Russia by&#160;Samsung will use&#160;solar panels that are&#160;directly integrated into the&#160;unit’s lid. The&#160;NC215S will be&#160;available in&#160;August and&#160;run Windows 7&#160;and Samsung claims that it&#160;will be&#160;able to&#160;offer a&#160;battery life of&#160;up to&#160;14,5 hours. Initially [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new&nbsp;laptop from Samsung incorporates a&nbsp;solar panel into the&nbsp;lid and&nbsp;could offer battery life of&nbsp;up to&nbsp;14,5 hours&nbsp;&#8212; but&nbsp;it’s initially only available in&nbsp;Russia <span id="more-1387"></span></p>
<p>A new&nbsp;laptop to&nbsp;be launched in&nbsp;Russia by&nbsp;Samsung will use&nbsp;solar panels that are&nbsp;directly integrated into the&nbsp;unit’s lid. The&nbsp;NC215S will be&nbsp;available in&nbsp;August and&nbsp;run Windows 7&nbsp;and Samsung claims that it&nbsp;will be&nbsp;able to&nbsp;offer a&nbsp;battery life of&nbsp;up to&nbsp;14,5 hours.</p>
<p>Initially unveiled at&nbsp;the Africa Regional Forum in&nbsp;Nairobi, Kenya, the&nbsp;new device has&nbsp;now been confirmed for&nbsp;the Russian market. It&nbsp;is also likely to&nbsp;be popular in&nbsp;African markets, where permanent sources of&nbsp;power are&nbsp;often not&nbsp;available. Samsung Electronics Africa hopes to&nbsp;reach $10 billion in&nbsp;sales by&nbsp;2015.</p>
<p>Samsung has&nbsp;an established interest in&nbsp;solar power, launching a&nbsp;mobile phone using the&nbsp;technology in&nbsp;2009 at&nbsp;the Mobile World Congress show in&nbsp;Barcelona. Although the&nbsp;‘Blue Earth’ device did&nbsp;not mark a&nbsp;breakthrough for&nbsp;the technology, it&nbsp;has increasingly also been used by&nbsp;other manufacturers&nbsp;&#8212; Fujitsu has&nbsp;also been examining the&nbsp;technology as&nbsp;part of&nbsp;a recent computing design competition.</p>
<p>The new&nbsp;netbook offers a&nbsp;conventional netbook configuration with a&nbsp;10,1in, 1024 x&nbsp;600-pixel display and&nbsp;a weight of&nbsp;1,3kg. An&nbsp;Intel Atom &#8470;&nbsp;570 (1,66 GHz) dual-core processor, 1GB&nbsp;of Ram&nbsp;and a&nbsp;250GB or&nbsp;320GB drive are&nbsp;the device’s main features. Prices have not&nbsp;yet been announced and&nbsp;there are&nbsp;currently no&nbsp;UK release plans. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/05/28/1387/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Infuse 4G&#160;review</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/04/27/1267/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/04/27/1267/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infuse 4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=1267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Samsung Infuse 4G, with a radio capable of achieving peak rates of 21Mbps, is being marketed as the fastest smartphone currently available from AT&#038;T. It’s the big brother to the Samsung Captivate, and fits just between that device and Samsung’s Galaxy S II when it comes to hardware specs. The Infuse 4G packs a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Samsung Infuse 4G, with a radio capable of achieving peak rates of 21Mbps, is being marketed as the fastest smartphone currently available from AT&#038;T. It’s the big brother to the Samsung Captivate, and fits just between that device and Samsung’s Galaxy S II when it comes to hardware specs. The Infuse 4G packs a gorgeous and massive 4.5-inch display, a thin and light form factor, and a solid camera. AT&#038;T’s first HSPA+ “4G” phones fell flat when it came to data — neither the HTC Inspire 4G nor the Motorola ATRIX 4G could hold a candle to the 3G download speeds available on the iPhone 4, and we won’t even discuss the upload speeds. Is the Infuse the AT&#038;T 4G smartphone you’ve been waiting for? I’ve been trekking along with it for more than a week and have penned my impressions, so check out the gallery below and then hit the jump for my full review.<br />
<strong><br />
Hardware / Display</strong></p>
<p>The very first thing you will, and I did, notice about the Infuse 4G is its huge 4.5-inch 800 x 480-pixel resolution Super AMOLED Plus display. It’s the same screen technology that’s on the DROID Charge from Verizon Wireless, and it’s hard to describe just how beautifully colorful, bright, and sharp it is. We first saw Samsung’s last generation Super AMOLED displays on its Galaxy S devices, and the Super AMOLED Plus improves on that panel in a number of ways. It’s easier to read under direct sunlight, and the blacks are even darker and inkier. Everyone needs to see this screen, even if you’re not on the market for a new phone. But I digress.</p>
<p>Despite having such a large display, the Infuse 4G is shockingly light at about 5 ounces. It’s thin, too, and measures just 0.35-in thick. The touch sensitive buttons for menu, home, return, and search all worked well during my tests. The power and volume buttons are all located within reach and there’s a 3.5mm headphone jack on the top of the phone. With a capable camera on board though, I wish Samsung added a camera quick-launch button, too.</p>
<p>Speaking of cameras, the Infuse 4G has two of them: a 1.3-megapixel front-facing shooter for video chats, and an 8-megapixel camera capable of recording full 720p HD video on the back. There’s also a single-LED flash, something the Captivate lacked. The back of the phone looks sharp and has a textured finish that blends nicely with the imitation metal border that wraps around the whole device. However, the textured back battery panel is flimsy. The HTC Inspire 4G, by contrast, has a rock solid unibody design. While I appreciate the Infuse 4G’s lightness and its aesthetic, it does feel a bit cheap.</p>
<p>Under the hood there’s a 1.2GHz processor, 16GB of storage built in, a 2GB microSD card, support for 802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi networks, a 1,750mAh battery, and more. That’s not a huge jump from the hardware that the Captivate offered, and I wish the phone packed Samsung’s dual-core Orion processor that’s inside the Galaxy S II. All of the aformentioned hardware powers Android 2.2.1 (Froyo), with Samsung’s last generation TouchWiz user interface. Let’s get into that now.</p>
<p><strong>Software<br />
</strong><br />
The Infuse 4G runs Google’s previous-generation Android 2.2.1 operating system. That’s not a huge deal, given that just 4% of phones are powered by the newer Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) OS, but it’s still odd to me that new devices are hitting the market with an outdated version preloaded. Here’s what really gets me though: Samsung’s previous-generation TouchWiz user interface.</p>
<p>I’ve spent time with Samsung’s new TouchWiz 4.0 on the DROID Charge, and I like what the firm has done to improve it compared to earlier versions. The UI feels faster, has several new and fun zooming features, and has an improved widget interface. Unfortunately, Samsung didn’t include that on the Infuse 4G, and I can’t figure out why. TouchWiz 3.0 is too colorful and cartoonish, and the widgets waste too much space. Thankfully the 1.2GHz processor kept everything snappy, though, so it never felt too sluggish. User interfaces are a matter of taste, and I’ve met plenty of people that prefer TouchWiz to competing UIs. For me personally though, it’s not a good fit.</p>
<p>As I’ve said in the past, I’m not a fan of the black background in the e-mail user interface, and don’t like Samsung’s default keyboard. There’s the option to use Swype on the Infuse 4G, which worked pretty well, and you can switch to the default Android keyboard, too. One software issue in particular that stood out was the sluggishness of the web browser. On multiple occasions it would lock up while I was trying to access a new website or pan around a page. Sometimes it would just stall for a few seconds, and then work properly again, but this is an issue I’ve typically seen with lower-end devices — not 1.2GHz “superphones.”</p>
<p>Last, but not least, the Infuse 4G is the first phone on AT&#038;T to allow for side-loading of third-party applications. That means you can load up an .apk file on the phone, access it via your file manager of choice, and then install it. Before you can start side-loading apps, however, you’ll have to visit Settings > Applications, and check the box next to “Unknown Sources.”</p>
<p><strong>Calling / Data</strong></p>
<p>The data speeds on the Infuse 4G are awful and are just barely better than what I’ve seen on the ATRIX 4G and the Inspire 4G. I averaged 3.07Mbps on the downlink and a pitiful .11Mbps on the uplink. That’s a solid 3G download speed, but overall the throughput is pathetic for anything with a 4G moniker. Verizon’s 4G LTE network consistently offers downlink speeds of 20Mbps with phones like the Samsung DROID Charge; that’s more than six times faster than AT&#038;T’s 4G network. I hope AT&#038;T issues a patch that fixes the speeds, and it’s upsetting the carrier is advertising this as its fastest phone yet — with theoretical 21Mbps peak download speeds — when even 5Mbps seems unachievable and the “3G” iPhone 4 regularly sees faster download speeds.</p>
<p>Calls on the Infuse 4G were decent, but nothing to call home about. I didn’t have a single dropped call during my tests in New York City, but voices did sound a bit watery during a few conversations. The speakerphone volume was more than sufficient. One friend said he could tell I was using a speakerphone but that I sounded “pretty clear.” Overall the call quality of the Infuse 4G sits around average in my book.</p>
<p><strong>Battery Life</strong></p>
<p>I was easily able to get through a full workday with moderate usage on a single charge of the Infuse 4G’s 1,750mAh battery. That’s an improvement over the Captivate, which frequently died on me before 5:00 p.m. Using the phone as my primary device, checking email, surfing the web, and listening to music, drained the battery noticeably faster, but I was also impressed with its standby time. Overall the Infuse 4G’s battery life was among the best I’ve seen on a high-powered Android phone yet. If you’re looking for a bit longer, I’d suggest checking out the ATRIX 4G, which managed to muster through a full workday with heavy usage.<br />
Camera</p>
<p>The Infuse 4G’s 8-megapixel took stellar photos, especially in good lighting conditions. Shots taken around New York City came out clear, and the sky on a sunny day was deep blue. On particularly bright days, I noticed that the sky would bleed a bit into my subjects, and shots came out overexposed altogether. Low light pictures came out OK, but just like the DROID Charge on Verizon, street lights really bled into my images, even with the anti-shake option enabled. I took a few more images while watching the Kentucky Derby in a dark pub, though, and the flash did a good job when I took a picture of my dinner plate.</p>
<p>The Infuse 4G’s camera is capable of recording 720p video, and the results were impressive, but on a par with what the Captivate was capable of shooting, too. I didn’t see much distortion, even while panning around. The camera also continuously auto-focuses, which is a nice touch.</p>
<p><strong>Wrap-up</strong></p>
<p>No, it’s not the 4G phone you’ve been waiting for, but it’s still a solid device. I’m shocked that AT&#038;T can get away with calling this a 4G phone, however, because I have yet to see data speeds that push the boundaries of its network. But if AT&#038;T making good on its “4G” claims and delivering solid data speeds isn’t a necessity for you, the Infuse 4G is worthy of your attention. The screen is incredible, I like the thin form factor, and the solid battery life was definitely appreciated. Samsung’s TouchWiz user interface isn’t for everyone either, but I still highly recommend you consider reserving a spot in your pocket for the Infuse 4G when it launches on May 15th for $199.99.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/04/27/1267/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Series 9&#160;900X3A</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/04/12/1193/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/04/12/1193/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=1193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s sleek, light and&#160;pretty impressive on&#160;the outside, but&#160;is the&#160;new Samsung 9000 series notebook a&#160;Mac Killer? Well, it&#160;certainly kicks the&#160;competition to&#160;the kerb when it&#160;comes to&#160;specifications, connectivity and&#160;performance. But&#160;as it&#8217;s aimed at&#160;the designer crowd, let&#8217;s take a&#160;look at&#160;its visual appeal and&#160;build first. Though Samsung quotes its&#160;laptop as&#160;being thinner than the&#160;latest Air&#160;revision, things aren&#8217;t quite as&#160;straightforward as&#160;that. While [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s sleek, light and&nbsp;pretty impressive on&nbsp;the outside, but&nbsp;is the&nbsp;new Samsung 9000 series notebook a&nbsp;Mac Killer?<span id="more-1193"></span></p>
<p>Well, it&nbsp;certainly kicks the&nbsp;competition to&nbsp;the kerb when it&nbsp;comes to&nbsp;specifications, connectivity and&nbsp;performance. But&nbsp;as it&#8217;s aimed at&nbsp;the designer crowd, let&#8217;s take a&nbsp;look at&nbsp;its visual appeal and&nbsp;build first.</p>
<p>Though Samsung quotes its&nbsp;laptop as&nbsp;being thinner than the&nbsp;latest Air&nbsp;revision, things aren&#8217;t quite as&nbsp;straightforward as&nbsp;that. While Apple&#8217;s laptop tapers from 17mm to&nbsp;a super-svelte 3mm, Samsung&#8217;s effort &#8216;only&#8217; manages 16,3mm to&nbsp;15,9mm from end&nbsp;to end. Impressive as&nbsp;that might be&nbsp;considering the&nbsp;amount of&nbsp;connectivity and&nbsp;processing power stuffed inside the&nbsp;900X3A&#8217;s chassis, it&nbsp;means that it&nbsp;doesn&#8217;t look nearly as&nbsp;slim and&nbsp;minimalistic as&nbsp;its rival.</p>
<p>Thankfully it&#8217;s also lighter, though again only just: at&nbsp;1,31kg compared to&nbsp;the Air&#8217;s 1,32kg, the&nbsp;difference is&nbsp;not really noticeable.</p>
<p>What about build? For&nbsp;its outer shell and&nbsp;palm rest the&nbsp;9 Series uses Duralumin, an&nbsp;aluminium alloy that&#8217;s twice as&nbsp;strong as&nbsp;the regular stuff, to&nbsp;ensure this is&nbsp;one of&nbsp;the more rugged metal-clad laptops around. However, whether this impression is&nbsp;true or&nbsp;not, it&nbsp;simply doesn&#8217;t feel as&nbsp;sturdy in&nbsp;the hand as&nbsp;Apple&#8217;s milled aluminium chassis.</p>
<p>Essentially, the&nbsp;Air feels like it&#8217;s been carved out&nbsp;of a&nbsp;single block of&nbsp;metal, while the&nbsp;900X3A feels like metal panels have been attached to&nbsp;a frame. Don&#8217;t get&nbsp;us wrong; the&nbsp;900X3A is&nbsp;still one&nbsp;of the&nbsp;best-built ultraportables we&#8217;ve had&nbsp;through the&nbsp;office, with perfectly fitted parts and&nbsp;barely a&nbsp;hint of&nbsp;flex. And&nbsp;it looks pretty special too, especially given the&nbsp;black livery.</p>
<p>That said, while the&nbsp;lid sports a&nbsp;brushed finish that&#8217;s very attractive and&nbsp;the silver Samsung logo set&nbsp;to the&nbsp;side is&nbsp;by no&nbsp;means unsightly, even picking the&nbsp;900X3A up&nbsp;once will result in&nbsp;a plethora of&nbsp;highly visible fingerprints, and&nbsp;the lid&#8217;s hinges also break up&nbsp;the laptop&#8217;s smooth lines. Furthermore, the&nbsp;lid&#8217;s metal top&nbsp;layer extends over the&nbsp;plastic screen surround below, a&nbsp;design feature that isn&#8217;t particularly appealing and&nbsp;gives an&nbsp;incoherent impression. The&nbsp;effect is&nbsp;exacerbated by&nbsp;the edge being left unpainted; a&nbsp;touch that would otherwise be&nbsp;desirable but&nbsp;here does highlight this issue.</p>
<p>Opening the&nbsp;900X3A up, we&#8217;re greeted by&nbsp;a similarly cohesively-challenged interior due&nbsp;again to&nbsp;that recessed screen bezel with its&nbsp;protruding metal outer edge, and&nbsp;Samsung&#8217;s decision to&nbsp;use a&nbsp;combination of&nbsp;metal and&nbsp;glossy plastic in&nbsp;the keyboard surround. If&nbsp;it had&nbsp;just used metal only for&nbsp;the entire base, this would be&nbsp;a notably more premium-looking machine. Fingerprints are&nbsp;again a&nbsp;serious issue, and&nbsp;you&#8217;ll want to&nbsp;wipe the&nbsp;palm-rests regularly.</p>
<p>Another annoyance is&nbsp;that the&nbsp;glossy plastics used in&nbsp;the base and&nbsp;the screen&#8217;s bezel are&nbsp;different, with the&nbsp;former sporting the&nbsp;extremely subtle gold-flecked effect we&nbsp;saw on&nbsp;many previous Samsung laptops including the&nbsp;premium X360. We&#8217;re also not&nbsp;sure about the&nbsp;shiny silver power button&nbsp;&#8212; we&nbsp;see what Samsung was&nbsp;trying to&nbsp;achieve but&nbsp;we don&#8217;t feel it&#8217;s quite worked.</p>
<p>So far, we&#8217;ve been quite negative regarding the&nbsp;900X3A&#8217;s looks, but&nbsp;let&#8217;s just put&nbsp;things into perspective: this is&nbsp;only in&nbsp;comparison to&nbsp;the Macbook Air, to&nbsp;which no&nbsp;other ultraportable has&nbsp;come even close where sheer style is&nbsp;concerned. On&nbsp;its own&nbsp;merits and&nbsp;when compared to&nbsp;the rest of&nbsp;the Windows laptop market, Samsung&#8217;s slick, light and&nbsp;well-built 9&nbsp;Series is&nbsp;one of&nbsp;the most attractive entrants to&nbsp;be found.</p>
<p>If Samsung were to&nbsp;have used a&nbsp;less fingerprint-prone finish for&nbsp;its Duralumin, removed the&nbsp;protruding edges, used metal for&nbsp;the entire base and&nbsp;etched the&nbsp;power button, its&nbsp;900X3A would have been a&nbsp;real winner in&nbsp;the design stakes. As&nbsp;is, it&#8217;s attractive but&nbsp;not totally lust-worthy.</p>
<p>When it&nbsp;comes to&nbsp;usability, things are&nbsp;far less ambiguous. The&nbsp;isolation or&nbsp;Chiclet keyboard features well-spaced, matt black keys. Layout is&nbsp;flawless, though we&nbsp;do miss the&nbsp;X360&#8217;s extra function keys which were tucked in&nbsp;to either side of&nbsp;the cursor keys.</p>
<p>Feedback is&nbsp;shallow but&nbsp;decent considering how&nbsp;little space Samsung has&nbsp;to work with, and&nbsp;the &#8216;click&#8217; the&nbsp;keys provide is&nbsp;subtle but&nbsp;adequate. Our&nbsp;only complaint is&nbsp;that on&nbsp;a few&nbsp;occasions the&nbsp;touchpad inadvertently registered our&nbsp;palm-movements and&nbsp;changed the&nbsp;cursor position during typing&nbsp;&#8212; something that can&nbsp;be managed with the&nbsp;touchpad software.</p>
<p>One important advantage the&nbsp;Series 9&nbsp;has over Apple&#8217;s Air&nbsp;is that it&nbsp;offers a&nbsp;backlit keyboard (though the&nbsp;original Macbook Air&nbsp;also had&nbsp;one, Apple removed this feature in&nbsp;its latest refreshes). Samsung&#8217;s backlighting system can&nbsp;be controlled manually or&nbsp;automatically by&nbsp;an ambient light sensor which worked flawlessly in&nbsp;our testing, and&nbsp;you can&nbsp;choose between no&nbsp;fewer than seven different brightness settings.</p>
<p>What really stands out&nbsp;from the&nbsp;crowd and&nbsp;its Samsung predecessors, though, is&nbsp;the 900X3A&#8217;s superb touchpad. Constructed from a&nbsp;single sheet of&nbsp;unmarked, sand-blasted black glass, the&nbsp;large multi-touch pad&nbsp;looks and&nbsp;feels lovely. Its&nbsp;surface offers the&nbsp;ideal blend of&nbsp;smooth and&nbsp;textured, and&nbsp;is very responsive.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve had&nbsp;serious issues with touchpads integrating their buttons into the&nbsp;touch surface in&nbsp;the past. The&nbsp;HP TouchSmart tm2&nbsp;is the&nbsp;most problematic example, but&nbsp;Samsung&#8217;s own&nbsp;SF310 also caused some annoyance.</p>
<p>However, the&nbsp;Lenovo ThinkPad X220t convinced us&nbsp;it could be&nbsp;done right on&nbsp;a Windows laptop, and&nbsp;now Samsung takes this a&nbsp;step further: we&nbsp;actually prefer the&nbsp;900X3A&#8217;s touchpad to&nbsp;any other we&#8217;ve tried, including those with physical buttons. The&nbsp;integrated &#8216;buttons&#8217; here offer perfect feedback with a&nbsp;positive click and&nbsp;absolutely no&nbsp;dead zone, and&nbsp;the pad&nbsp;never misinterpreted our&nbsp;presses as&nbsp;touches. Brilliant! Compared to&nbsp;the Air&#8217;s touchpad, it&#8217;s essentially a&nbsp;dead heat, which is&nbsp;really saying something considering how&nbsp;highly we&nbsp;regard that.</p>
<p>From the&nbsp;900X3A&#8217;s class-leading touchpad things only get&nbsp;better, especially when it&nbsp;comes to&nbsp;audio and&nbsp;video. Considering how&nbsp;little space the&nbsp;1,5W speakers have to&nbsp;play with, the&nbsp;volume levels they produce are&nbsp;nothing short of&nbsp;amazing. Admittedly they distort at&nbsp;maximum and&nbsp;are inevitably lacking in&nbsp;the bass department, but&nbsp;even with the&nbsp;volume turned down we&nbsp;would be&nbsp;more than happy to&nbsp;use these for&nbsp;entertainment.</p>
<p>If anything, the&nbsp;screen is&nbsp;even more impressive. In&nbsp;fact, if&nbsp;we hadn&#8217;t just reviewed the&nbsp;Lenovo ThinkPad X220t with its&nbsp;lovely IPS-panel display, we&nbsp;would be&nbsp;classing this as&nbsp;the best display we&nbsp;had seen on&nbsp;a small laptop. As&nbsp;you might have guessed from that, the&nbsp;900X3A still uses good old&nbsp;TN, but&nbsp;this 13,3in panel doesn&#8217;t display many of&nbsp;the weaknesses we&nbsp;would usually associate with the&nbsp;technology.</p>
<p>First off, there are&nbsp;its viewing angles. Horizontally, they are&nbsp;close to&nbsp;infinite with hardly any&nbsp;drop-off in&nbsp;contrast or&nbsp;corruption of&nbsp;colour. Even viewing from the&nbsp;top results in&nbsp;minimal contrast and&nbsp;colour shift, leaving the&nbsp;image eminently viewable. Only when viewing from the&nbsp;bottom do&nbsp;things become unwatchable, and&nbsp;on a&nbsp;laptop that&#8217;s not&nbsp;a likely scenario.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the&nbsp;contrast and&nbsp;backlighting. Backlighting was&nbsp;very even with not&nbsp;a hint of&nbsp;bleed, meaning no&nbsp;distracting pale splotches while viewing dark material. Black levels were also superb, so&nbsp;you can&nbsp;really pick out&nbsp;every detail in&nbsp;dark and&nbsp;gritty movies and&nbsp;games, regardless of&nbsp;how bright you&nbsp;set the&nbsp;backlight.</p>
<p>Speaking of&nbsp;brightness, this is&nbsp;another factor that sets the&nbsp;Samsung apart. At&nbsp;400 nits, Samsung claims its&nbsp;900X3A has&nbsp;the brightest display of&nbsp;its size in&nbsp;the world, and&nbsp;after nearly getting our&nbsp;retinas seared off&nbsp;we&#8217;re not&nbsp;about to&nbsp;argue. The&nbsp;display can&nbsp;go from almost completely dark for&nbsp;ultra battery saving to&nbsp;painfully bright, which is&nbsp;handy when trying to&nbsp;work or&nbsp;play in&nbsp;a sunny location.</p>
<p>Combined with excellent sharpness, we&nbsp;really can&#8217;t think of&nbsp;any negatives with this screen, especially since Samsung has&nbsp;made the&nbsp;excellent decision of&nbsp;going for&nbsp;a matt screen finish to&nbsp;keep reflections to&nbsp;a minimum! We&nbsp;would even say&nbsp;it beats that on&nbsp;the 13,3inch Macbook Air, except Apple offers a&nbsp;higher 1,440 x&nbsp;900 resolution compared to&nbsp;the 900X3A&#8217;s 1,366 x&nbsp;768. This may&nbsp;sound like a&nbsp;deal breaker but&nbsp;in use&nbsp;the Series 9&nbsp;still feels like it&nbsp;has plenty of&nbsp;desktop real estate.</p>
<p>Rounding off&nbsp;the Series 9&#8217;s audio-visual talents is&nbsp;high-definition (720p) webcam, yet&nbsp;another win&nbsp;over its&nbsp;closest rival.</p>
<p>Connectivity is&nbsp;also streets ahead, mainly due&nbsp;to the&nbsp;presence of&nbsp;USB 3.0. Because the&nbsp;laptop&#8217;s tapered sides are&nbsp;too thin to&nbsp;accommodate even USB&nbsp;ports without sticking out, Samsung has&nbsp;implemented a&nbsp;rather nifty solution: three ports each on&nbsp;both the&nbsp;left and&nbsp;right side are&nbsp;found when you&nbsp;pull down magnetically-held flaps. We&nbsp;feared these would be&nbsp;a weak point and&nbsp;might break with constant use, but&nbsp;in our&nbsp;testing we&nbsp;found the&nbsp;mechanism to&nbsp;be very sturdy.</p>
<p>On the&nbsp;left we&nbsp;have a&nbsp;proprietary Gigabit Ethernet port which requires an&nbsp;adapter to&nbsp;hook up, a&nbsp;micro HDMI port and&nbsp;a USB&nbsp;3,0, or&nbsp;SuperSpeed port. As&nbsp;a further point in&nbsp;its favour, Samsung actually supplies the&nbsp;Ethernet adapter as&nbsp;standard, rather than making it&nbsp;an expensive optional extra as&nbsp;with Apple&#8217;s Air.</p>
<p>On the&nbsp;right you&#8217;ll find a&nbsp;micro-SD card reader, 3,5mm headphone/microphone jack and&nbsp;always-on USB&nbsp;port which can&nbsp;be used to&nbsp;charge devices even if&nbsp;the laptop is&nbsp;turned off. Last but&nbsp;not least, Bluetooth 3,0 and&nbsp;Wi-Fi N&nbsp;are also on&nbsp;board. </p>
<p>The good news continues with the&nbsp;900X3A&#8217;s specifications, with the&nbsp;headline being its&nbsp;use of&nbsp;a dual-core Intel Core i5&#8212;2537M. Intel&#8217;s new&nbsp;Sandy Bridge low&nbsp;voltage mobile processors provide the&nbsp;best efficiency to&nbsp;performance ratios on&nbsp;the market, so&nbsp;though its&nbsp;standard clock speed is&nbsp;only 1,4GHz, this can&nbsp;turbo clock up&nbsp;to 2,3GHz and&nbsp;utilizes Hyperthreading to&nbsp;provide up&nbsp;to four virtual cores. Its&nbsp;CPU alone makes the&nbsp;900X3A the&nbsp;most powerful ultraportable in&nbsp;its class, and&nbsp;will completely wipe the&nbsp;floor with the&nbsp;Macbook Air&#8217;s paltry 1,86GHz Core 2&nbsp;Duo, which is&nbsp;by now&nbsp;two generations behind.</p>
<p>The 9&nbsp;Series also ships with 4GB&nbsp;of RAM&nbsp;as standard. It&#8217;s configured in&nbsp;a single stick of&nbsp;4GB taking up&nbsp;one of&nbsp;the two&nbsp;DIMM slots so&nbsp;Samsung can&nbsp;conceivably offer models with 8GB&nbsp;of RAM&nbsp;in the&nbsp;future. What&#8217;s more, though Samsung obviously doesn&#8217;t encourage ripping the&nbsp;laptop apart , it&nbsp;would theoretically be&nbsp;possible to&nbsp;upgrade these yourself. </p>
<p>For storage there&#8217;s a&nbsp;capacious 128GB SSD&nbsp;(leaving you&nbsp;with a&nbsp;98GB capacity as&nbsp;a 21GB section is&nbsp;reserved for&nbsp;a recovery partition), and&nbsp;though the&nbsp;13,3in Air&nbsp;offers the&nbsp;same capacity, its&nbsp;SSD is&nbsp;likely to&nbsp;be slower due&nbsp;to using an&nbsp;older controller. We&#8217;re yet&nbsp;to confirm how&nbsp;this is&nbsp;configured, and&nbsp;thus how&nbsp;easy it&nbsp;might be&nbsp;to upgrade, but&nbsp;we suspect it&nbsp;will be&nbsp;something of&nbsp;a chore to&nbsp;do so.</p>
<p>The only area where the&nbsp;Air still wins out&nbsp;in terms of&nbsp;internal specs is&nbsp;in offering dedicated graphics, albeit in&nbsp;the shape of&nbsp;the rather dated Nvidia GeForce 320M. This is&nbsp;better for&nbsp;light 3D&nbsp;gaming and&nbsp;Photoshop, but&nbsp;Intel&#8217;s integrated HD-3000 solution comes out&nbsp;tops for&nbsp;hardware video decoding.</p>
<p>As expected, the&nbsp;OS of&nbsp;choice is&nbsp;Windows 7&nbsp;Home Premium, and&nbsp;the install is&nbsp;fairly clean with only a&nbsp;few Samsung applications. Samsung&#8217;s proprietary fast-booting software ensures that Windows boot times are&nbsp;reduced to&nbsp;as little as&nbsp;a claimed 15&nbsp;seconds, and&nbsp;in our&nbsp;testing the&nbsp;900X3A came close with an&nbsp;average of&nbsp;20 seconds. One&nbsp;minor annoyance is&nbsp;Samsung&#8217;s Wireless app&nbsp;which keeps notifying you&nbsp;of the&nbsp;available connections every five minutes, but&nbsp;this can&nbsp;easily be&nbsp;turned off.</p>
<p>As with the&nbsp;Air, the&nbsp;six-cell, 46Wh battery in&nbsp;the 900X3A is&nbsp;non-removable, so&nbsp;we were hoping Samsung&#8217;s quoted battery life of&nbsp;seven hours wasn&#8217;t an&nbsp;exaggeration. Again, the&nbsp;Series 9&nbsp;allayed our&nbsp;fears by&nbsp;providing over four hours with Wi-Fi and&nbsp;Bluetooth enabled, while switching these off&nbsp;and lowering the&nbsp;brightness to&nbsp;the 40&nbsp;percent equivalent we&nbsp;run the&nbsp;Productivity test at&nbsp;on other laptops resulted in&nbsp;a solid seven hours and&nbsp;20 minutes.</p>
<p>In general use&nbsp;the 900X3A stays cool, only getting warm on&nbsp;the left and&nbsp;running very quietly even under load. In&nbsp;fact, in&nbsp;anything but&nbsp;the quietest environment it&#8217;s completely inaudible.</p>
<p>Finally, we&nbsp;come to&nbsp;value, and&nbsp;this might come as&nbsp;a bit&nbsp;of a&nbsp;shock: the&nbsp;RRP of&nbsp;the 900X3A is&nbsp;a whopping $2499! However, to&nbsp;put this seemingly high price into context, the&nbsp;Samsung might not&nbsp;look as&nbsp;sexy or&nbsp;offer as&nbsp;high a&nbsp;resolution on&nbsp;its otherwise superior screen, but&nbsp;provides a&nbsp;vastly better processor and&nbsp;platform, fast external connectivity with USB&nbsp;3,0, a&nbsp;backlit keyboard and, of&nbsp;course, Windows 7.</p>
<p>Our only real complaint, aside from the&nbsp;somewhat underwhelming design (again, only when compared to&nbsp;the Macbook Air&nbsp;&#8212; among Windows 7&nbsp;laptops it&nbsp;has few&nbsp;rivals) is&nbsp;its high-maintenance glossy finish, and&nbsp;it would have been nice to&nbsp;see an&nbsp;included cleaning cloth and&nbsp;carrying case when paying this much.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re also rather disappointed that the&nbsp;11inch Series 9&nbsp;is not&nbsp;set to&nbsp;be making it&nbsp;over to&nbsp;this side of&nbsp;the Pacific. Hopefully, if&nbsp;the 13&nbsp;inch model is&nbsp;successful, Samsung will be&nbsp;persuaded to&nbsp;change its&nbsp;mind.</p>
<p>Verdict</p>
<p>Lighter and&nbsp;arguably thinner than Apple&#8217;s Macbook Air, the&nbsp;13,3inch, Series 9&nbsp;900X3A may&nbsp;not be&nbsp;as pretty and&nbsp;attracts more fingerprints, but&nbsp;offers far&nbsp;more power and&nbsp;connectivity. Combined with a&nbsp;truly excellent screen, surprisingly good speakers, the&nbsp;best touchpad on&nbsp;any Windows laptop and&nbsp;decent battery life, if&nbsp;you&#8217;re looking for&nbsp;one of&nbsp;the thinnest and&nbsp;lightest Windows 7&nbsp;machines around it&#8217;s an&nbsp;excellent choice and&nbsp;well worth its&nbsp;high asking price. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2011/04/12/1193/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Galaxy Player to&#160;be unveiled at&#160;CES 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/12/13/855/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/12/13/855/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy Player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fourth generation iPod Touch raised the&#160;bar for&#160;portable media players with its&#160;1GHz processor, Retina display, front and&#160;back cameras etc. With no&#160;device that can&#160;deliver on&#160;the variety of&#160;features as&#160;it can, it&#160;now comfortably rules the&#160;roost. We&#8217;d heard of&#160;Samsung trying to&#160;create a&#160;media player based on&#160;their highly successful Android-based Galaxy S&#160;smartphone. But&#160;those dreams seemed over when we&#160;saw a&#160;cheaper Galaxy Player [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fourth generation iPod Touch raised the&nbsp;bar for&nbsp;portable media players with its&nbsp;1GHz processor, Retina display, front and&nbsp;back cameras etc. With no&nbsp;device that can&nbsp;deliver on&nbsp;the variety of&nbsp;features as&nbsp;it can, it&nbsp;now comfortably rules the&nbsp;roost. We&#8217;d heard of&nbsp;Samsung trying to&nbsp;create a&nbsp;media player based on&nbsp;their highly successful Android-based Galaxy S&nbsp;smartphone. But&nbsp;those dreams seemed over when we&nbsp;saw a&nbsp;cheaper Galaxy Player 50, which was&nbsp;basically the&nbsp;mid-range Galaxy 3&nbsp;i5801 with its&nbsp;GSM radio chipped off&nbsp;two months ago.</p>
<p>And today, our&nbsp;bud over at&nbsp;the Samsung Hub&nbsp;has delivered the&nbsp;good news that the&nbsp;Galaxy Player is&nbsp;indeed on&nbsp;track for&nbsp;a show off&nbsp;at the&nbsp;CES 2011 in&nbsp;the first week of&nbsp;January 2011. The&nbsp;Galaxy Player (YP-GB1) will have the&nbsp;same 9,9mm thickness of&nbsp;its Galaxy S&nbsp;smartphone cousin. Although chubbier than the&nbsp;7,2mm iPod Touch, I&#8217;m pretty sure nobody would call 9,9 millimeters chubby. It&nbsp;also has&nbsp;similar features to&nbsp;the Galaxy S&nbsp;like Android 2,2 Froyo, 1GHz processor, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 3.0.</p>
<p>However, the&nbsp;screen is&nbsp;a 4-inch Super Clear LCD&nbsp;instead of&nbsp;the highly vivid Super AMOLED displays as&nbsp;seen on&nbsp;a few&nbsp;high-end Sammy phones. Its&nbsp;800 x&nbsp;480 pixel resolution is&nbsp;a little lower than the&nbsp;iPod Touch&#8217;s 960&nbsp;x 640&nbsp;pixel, but&nbsp;the Galaxy Player&#8217;s bigger screen should come in&nbsp;handy while viewing videos. It&nbsp;plays HD&nbsp;videos out&nbsp;of the&nbsp;box, has&nbsp;a microSD card slot for&nbsp;memory expansion and&nbsp;a 1200 mAh&nbsp;removable battery. </p>
<p>A rear 3,2 megapixel camera will be&nbsp;used for&nbsp;taking snaps and&nbsp;videos, while a&nbsp;front-facing camera can&nbsp;be used for&nbsp;video calls. There&#8217;s also a&nbsp;GPS chip&nbsp;&#8212; another trump over the&nbsp;iPod Touch. But&nbsp;without 3G&nbsp;connectivity, Google Maps will pretty much be&nbsp;useless once you&nbsp;come out&nbsp;of range from a&nbsp;Wi-fi internet connection. But&nbsp;by using third party mapping software that pre-load entire maps on&nbsp;the device itself, the&nbsp;Galaxy Player could possibly work well as&nbsp;a in-car GPS&nbsp;navigation device replacement. Speaking of&nbsp;apps, there&#8217;s access to&nbsp;Android Market as&nbsp;well as&nbsp;Samsung Apps on&nbsp;this one.  </p>
<p>There&#8217;s no&nbsp;mention of&nbsp;pricing, let&#8217;s hope they get&nbsp;it right with it&nbsp;this time (we&#8217;re referring to&nbsp;the horrendous Rs. 38,000 Galaxy Tab&nbsp;price at&nbsp;launch). It&nbsp;would otherwise have a&nbsp;great difficulty surviving in&nbsp;the market against the&nbsp;iPod Touch 4th&nbsp;gen that starts at&nbsp;Rs. 12,500 for&nbsp;the 8GB&nbsp;version. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/12/13/855/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Epic 4G&#160;(Sprint)</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/12/576/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/12/576/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epic 4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you&#160;like keyboards? Do&#160;you need the&#160;click of&#160;a physical button to&#160;feel like you&#8217;re actually writing something on&#160;your phone? Don&#8217;t be&#160;ashamed if&#160;you do. The&#160;Samsung Epic 4G&#160;for Sprint is&#160;the carrier&#8217;s second 4G&#160;phone, and&#160;it&#8217;s the&#160;first with a&#160;physical QWERTY keyboard. It&#8217;s a&#160;powerful, high-end Android smartphone that is&#160;a great choice for&#160;Sprint customers, and&#160;it&#8217;s our&#160;new Editors&#8217; Choice for&#160;keyboarded smartphones on&#160;Sprint. Physical Features [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you&nbsp;like keyboards? Do&nbsp;you need the&nbsp;click of&nbsp;a physical button to&nbsp;feel like you&#8217;re actually writing something on&nbsp;your phone? Don&#8217;t be&nbsp;ashamed if&nbsp;you do. The&nbsp;Samsung Epic 4G&nbsp;for Sprint is&nbsp;the carrier&#8217;s second 4G&nbsp;phone, and&nbsp;it&#8217;s the&nbsp;first with a&nbsp;physical QWERTY keyboard. It&#8217;s a&nbsp;powerful, high-end Android smartphone that is&nbsp;a great choice for&nbsp;Sprint customers, and&nbsp;it&#8217;s our&nbsp;new Editors&#8217; Choice for&nbsp;keyboarded smartphones on&nbsp;Sprint.<span id="more-576"></span></p>
<p><em>Physical Features</em><br />
The Epic 4G&nbsp;is a&nbsp;surprisingly thin slider phone at&nbsp;4,9 by&nbsp;3,5 by&nbsp;.56 inches (HWD) and&nbsp;5,46 ounces. Yes, it&#8217;s a&nbsp;lot thicker than the&nbsp;HTC EVO&nbsp;4G, but&nbsp;the screen slides to&nbsp;the side to&nbsp;reveal a&nbsp;rather large QWERTY keyboard, so&nbsp;give the&nbsp;Epic a&nbsp;break. Otherwise, the&nbsp;phone is&nbsp;about the&nbsp;same size as&nbsp;the EVO, although its&nbsp;4-inch screen is&nbsp;smaller than the&nbsp;EVO&#8217;s 4,3-inch panel (but the&nbsp;same 800-by-480 resolution.) The&nbsp;Epic&#8217;s screen uses Samsung&#8217;s new&nbsp;Super AMOLED technology, which offers the&nbsp;same gorgeous, hypersaturated colors and&nbsp;low power consumption as&nbsp;earlier AMOLED screens but&nbsp;with much better visibility in&nbsp;sunlight. </p>
<p>The Epic 4G&nbsp;will live or&nbsp;die on&nbsp;the strength of&nbsp;its keyboard; I&#8217;m happy to&nbsp;say it&nbsp;will live. This is&nbsp;an excellent keyboard. It&nbsp;has five rows, including a&nbsp;dedicated number row, and&nbsp;physical keys for&nbsp;Android&#8217;s home, back, menu, and&nbsp;search functions. The&nbsp;keys are&nbsp;slightly raised, slightly domed, and&nbsp;nicely separated. You&nbsp;can&#8217;t use&nbsp;it one-handed like you&nbsp;can a&nbsp;BlackBerry or&nbsp;Palm Pre&nbsp;($299,99&#8212;549.99,), but&nbsp;that&#8217;s true with all&nbsp;phones in&nbsp;this form factor.</p>
<p>Almost passive-aggressively, Samsung seems to&nbsp;have sabotaged the&nbsp;four important touch buttons below the&nbsp;screen. When they&#8217;re not&nbsp;lit up, they disappear and&nbsp;become impossible to&nbsp;press; you&nbsp;have to&nbsp;tap on&nbsp;the screen to&nbsp;light them up&nbsp;while you&#8217;re in&nbsp;the middle of&nbsp;doing something else. Adding insult to&nbsp;injury, sometimes the&nbsp;buttons don&#8217;t respond even when they&#8217;re lit&nbsp;up, which is&nbsp;very frustrating. I&nbsp;tapped a&nbsp;lot.</p>
<p>If you&nbsp;don&#8217;t want to&nbsp;use the&nbsp;excellent physical keyboard, the&nbsp;Epic comes with six&nbsp;possible virtual keyboards. There&#8217;s the&nbsp;Swype text-entry method, which lets you&nbsp;drag your finger across the&nbsp;screen without lifting it, as&nbsp;well as&nbsp;Samsung&#8217;s and&nbsp;Google&#8217;s portrait and&nbsp;landscape mode keyboards.<br />
<em><br />
Phone, 3G, and&nbsp;4G Performance</em><br />
The Epic 4G&nbsp;is a&nbsp;perfectly good phone, and&nbsp;probably slightly better than the&nbsp;EVO. It&nbsp;connected one&nbsp;more call than the&nbsp;EVO out&nbsp;of ten&nbsp;in our&nbsp;weak-signal test. The&nbsp;phone&#8217;s earpiece and&nbsp;speakerphone are&nbsp;both loud enough for&nbsp;any use, and&nbsp;while sound in&nbsp;the earpiece is&nbsp;a touch muffled, that&#8217;s only comparing it&nbsp;to super-duper-sharp phones like the&nbsp;Motorola Droid X&nbsp;($199,99&#8212;569.99,). Transmissions have a&nbsp;problem with wind noise, and&nbsp;transmissions from the&nbsp;speakerphone sound a&nbsp;bit tinny, but&nbsp;really, this one&nbsp;is fine. The&nbsp;Epic 4G&nbsp;has Bluetooth 3,0 (which offers no&nbsp;real consumer advantages over version 2,1) and&nbsp;connected to&nbsp;our Aliph Jawbone Icon ($99,) Bluetooth headset without trouble. But&nbsp;while the&nbsp;Epic 4G&nbsp;has voice commands, they don&#8217;t work over Bluetooth. I&nbsp;have to&nbsp;re-test battery life, but&nbsp;the phone got&nbsp;enough talk time that battery shouldn&#8217;t sway your purchase either way.</p>
<p>The Epic 4G&nbsp;is famously Sprint&#8217;s second &laquo;4G&raquo; phone, which means it&nbsp;can connect to&nbsp;the Internet using Clearwire&#8217;s WiMAX network in&nbsp;a few&nbsp;dozen cities. It&nbsp;doesn&#8217;t work anywhere within 100&nbsp;miles of&nbsp;New York City, for&nbsp;instance, so&nbsp;I had&nbsp;to shack up&nbsp;in Philadelphia to&nbsp;test it. That&#8217;s better than last year, though, when I&nbsp;had to&nbsp;go all&nbsp;the way&nbsp;to Baltimore.</p>
<p>WiMAX seems to&nbsp;have trouble penetrating buildings; when I&nbsp;went indoors, the&nbsp;signal dropped much more quickly than Sprint&#8217;s quite robust 3G&nbsp;signal. That said, when WiMAX worked, it&nbsp;worked: I&nbsp;got speeds up&nbsp;to 6,6 megabits down on&nbsp;the Epic 4G, which is&nbsp;about six&nbsp;times the&nbsp;average speed of&nbsp;Sprint&#8217;s 3G&nbsp;network. (Uploads are&nbsp;capped at&nbsp;1 megabit/second.) This drains the&nbsp;battery, so&nbsp;it&#8217;s best to&nbsp;use 4G&nbsp;as a&nbsp;&laquo;turbo boost&raquo; when you&nbsp;need the&nbsp;extra speed. If&nbsp;you don&#8217;t have 4G&nbsp;around, the&nbsp;Epic will connect to&nbsp;802,11b/g/n Wi-Fi networks as&nbsp;well. The&nbsp;phone both tethers to&nbsp;PCs via&nbsp;USB as&nbsp;a modem and&nbsp;works as&nbsp;a Wi-FI hotspot for&nbsp;up to&nbsp;five devices. 4G&nbsp;is also unlimited. There&#8217;s no&nbsp;data cap&nbsp;on WiMAX use, at&nbsp;least for&nbsp;now.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll pay&nbsp;$10 extra a&nbsp;month for&nbsp;the 4G&nbsp;service whether or&nbsp;not you&nbsp;can use&nbsp;it -you can&#8217;t buy&nbsp;the Epic without the&nbsp;4G supplement. But&nbsp;none of&nbsp;these gripes change the&nbsp;fact that 4G&nbsp;is the&nbsp;future, and&nbsp;if you&#8217;re going to&nbsp;be stuck with a&nbsp;phone for&nbsp;the next 18&nbsp;months, you&nbsp;might as&nbsp;well future-proof it. Clearwire positively insists that they&#8217;ll cover 120&nbsp;million Americans by&nbsp;the end&nbsp;of the&nbsp;year.</p>
<p><em>Android Software</em><br />
We&#8217;ve been down this road before: The&nbsp;Epic 4G&nbsp;is a&nbsp;Galaxy S&nbsp;phone like the&nbsp;Samsung Captivate ($199,99&#8212;499.99,) for&nbsp;AT&#038;T and&nbsp;the Samsung Vibrant ($199,99&#8212;499.99,) for&nbsp;T-Mobile. To&nbsp;wit, it&#8217;s an&nbsp;Android 2,1 device with a&nbsp;set of&nbsp;mostly-useful Samsung extensions, such as&nbsp;built-in Twitter and&nbsp;Facebook integration through Social Hub; Buddies Now, a&nbsp;sort of&nbsp;visual Rolodex of&nbsp;your favorite people and&nbsp;their status updates; Daily Briefing, a&nbsp;combined news/weather app; and&nbsp;a much-improved contact book which lets you&nbsp;swipe right and&nbsp;left to&nbsp;check your friends&#8217; status updates or&nbsp;contact them by&nbsp;various means. It&nbsp;will handle any&nbsp;e-mail account you&nbsp;have coming, including Exchange, and&nbsp;it integrates Exchange, Google, and&nbsp;Facebook events onto one&nbsp;calendar. Samsung&#8217;s widgets and&nbsp;social networking integration are&nbsp;similar to, and&nbsp;slightly inferior to, HTC&#8217;s-but don&#8217;t let&nbsp;that sway your decision if&nbsp;you&#8217;re drawn to&nbsp;the Epic for&nbsp;its keyboard.</p>
<p>The software is&nbsp;running on&nbsp;a 1-GHz Samsung Hummingbird processor, which generally scored faster on&nbsp;our benchmarks than the&nbsp;Qualcomm Snapdragon in&nbsp;HTC&#8217;s phones and&nbsp;roughly on&nbsp;par with the&nbsp;TI OMAP in&nbsp;Motorola&#8217;s latest Verizon devices. Hummingbird really sets itself apart on&nbsp;graphics performance, though-on the&nbsp;industry-standard Neocore graphics benchmark, Samsung&#8217;s Galaxy S&nbsp;phones scored far&nbsp;and away better than all&nbsp;other Android devices. That means this is&nbsp;a better gaming machine than the&nbsp;EVO.</p>
<p>Sprint adds their Nascar and&nbsp;NFL apps, as&nbsp;well as&nbsp;Sprint Navigation and&nbsp;Sprint TV. Sprint TV&nbsp;is an&nbsp;unsung gem; it&nbsp;has clips and&nbsp;full episodes from a&nbsp;wide range of&nbsp;TV networks, and&nbsp;many of&nbsp;them come free with your service plan. If&nbsp;you&#8217;re connected to&nbsp;4G, videos become sharp and&nbsp;clear, although they occasionally lose (and then re-gain) lip&nbsp;sync.</p>
<p>One painful omission is&nbsp;YouTube HQ, which Sprint made such a&nbsp;big deal about when they introduced the&nbsp;EVO. On&nbsp;the Epic, the&nbsp;YouTube app&nbsp;is unwatchable; it&#8217;s a&nbsp;hideous mush of&nbsp;blocky compression. I&nbsp;don&#8217;t understand why&nbsp;Sprint didn&#8217;t give the&nbsp;Epic the&nbsp;same sharp YouTube video quality that the&nbsp;EVO has.</p>
<p>I hope it&nbsp;isn&#8217;t because of&nbsp;the upcoming Samsung Media Hub, a&nbsp;movies-and-TV store which I&nbsp;got to&nbsp;see a&nbsp;brief demo of, and&nbsp;which will be&nbsp;coming to&nbsp;the Epic in&nbsp;a few&nbsp;weeks. Media Hub&nbsp;is a&nbsp;typical expensive, movie-studio-approved video store, with $3/day rentals and&nbsp;$12 to&nbsp;20 movie purchases. It&nbsp;doesn&#8217;t fulfill that &laquo;I want to&nbsp;watch free video&raquo; desire that YouTube so&nbsp;neatly satiates.</p>
<p>Sprint says the&nbsp;Epic will get&nbsp;an Android 2,2 upgrade &laquo;soon.&raquo; That will bring voice dialing over Bluetooth and&nbsp;supposedly better browser performance, though I&nbsp;didn&#8217;t find noticeably different page load times when I&nbsp;upgraded the&nbsp;Evo from 2,1 to&nbsp;2.2.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also happy to&nbsp;say the&nbsp;Epic 4G&nbsp;has no&nbsp;problems with GPS&nbsp;or AGPS fixes. My&nbsp;location appeared quickly in&nbsp;Google Maps Navigation and&nbsp;Sprint Navigation.</p>
<p><em>Multimedia</em><br />
The Epic 4G&nbsp;is an&nbsp;excellent media phone-better than the&nbsp;EVO. Why, you&nbsp;say, when the&nbsp;EVO has&nbsp;a bigger screen? It&#8217;s all&nbsp;about codecs. The&nbsp;Epic 4G&nbsp;plays an&nbsp;unusually wide array of&nbsp;video files, including XVID, DIVX, and&nbsp;H.264 with AAC&nbsp;audio, including many files in&nbsp;720p HD&nbsp;format. That means fewer videos will require re-encoding compared to&nbsp;other phones. Video looks sharp and&nbsp;plays clearly on&nbsp;the screen, including over Bluetooth stereo headphones. While there&#8217;s no&nbsp;HDMI out&nbsp;to play video on&nbsp;a TV, Samsung said they&#8217;ll sell an&nbsp;analog TV-out cable (but didn&#8217;t give me&nbsp;any further details.)</p>
<p>Music also performs well here, with the&nbsp;Epic supporting a&nbsp;wide range of&nbsp;formats including MP3, WMA, OGG, and&nbsp;AAC. The&nbsp;phone has&nbsp;about 450MB of&nbsp;free internal memory and&nbsp;comes with a&nbsp;16GB microSD card that fits in&nbsp;a slot under the&nbsp;back cover. Fortunately, you&nbsp;don&#8217;t have to&nbsp;remove the&nbsp;battery to&nbsp;get at&nbsp;the memory slot.</p>
<p>To get&nbsp;your media onto the&nbsp;phone, you&#8217;ll probably drag and&nbsp;drop. The&nbsp;Epic 4G, unlike the&nbsp;Vibrant and&nbsp;Captivate, doesn&#8217;t work with Windows Media Player or&nbsp;with Samsung&#8217;s Kies syncing software. Fortunately, the&nbsp;third-party program doubleTwist (Free,) will work to&nbsp;sync media to&nbsp;the Epic 4G-and with the&nbsp;phone&#8217;s excellent codec support, you&#8217;re much less likely to&nbsp;encounter unwatchable files than on&nbsp;other phones.</p>
<p>The Epic 4G&#8217;s 5-megapixel camera, with a&nbsp;weak LED&nbsp;flash, is&nbsp;a middling example of&nbsp;the breed. It&nbsp;has extremely little shutter delay, which is&nbsp;good. But&nbsp;anything below full daylight tends to&nbsp;make photos become a&nbsp;bit soft. In&nbsp;video mode, the&nbsp;Epic 4G&nbsp;records smooth but&nbsp;overexposed 720p HD&nbsp;videos. That said, the&nbsp;Epic&#8217;s 5-megapixel camera provides a&nbsp;better experience than the&nbsp;EVO&#8217;s 8-megapixel model did, as&nbsp;the EVO&nbsp;had even worse problems with low-light blur and&nbsp;jerky HD&nbsp;videos.</p>
<p>The phone also has&nbsp;a front-facing, VGA&nbsp;resolution camera that&#8217;s in&nbsp;theory for&nbsp;video calling, but&nbsp;like all&nbsp;non-iPhone front-facing cameras we&nbsp;consider it&nbsp;useless. Qik&nbsp;and Fring, the&nbsp;two video calling programs for&nbsp;Android, are&nbsp;both unreservedly awful. On&nbsp;the other hand, now&nbsp;you have that video-calling camera in&nbsp;case the&nbsp;software companies get&nbsp;their acts together.</p>
<p><em>Conclusions</em><br />
At $349 minus a&nbsp;$100 mail-in rebate (or $249 at&nbsp;Radio Shack and&nbsp;Best Buy), the&nbsp;Epic 4G&nbsp;costs $50 more than the&nbsp;HTC EVO&nbsp;4G for&nbsp;Sprint. But&nbsp;since the&nbsp;two-year service contract for&nbsp;either phone costs at&nbsp;least $1,920, a&nbsp;$50 difference in&nbsp;price actually doesn&#8217;t matter much. Avid mobile gamers and&nbsp;people with a&nbsp;lot of&nbsp;their own&nbsp;video files will want to&nbsp;go with the&nbsp;Epic for&nbsp;its powerful Hummingbird GPU&nbsp;and great codec support; YouTube aficionados will go&nbsp;with the&nbsp;EVO. The&nbsp;real difference is&nbsp;the keyboard. If&nbsp;you want to&nbsp;type your messages, surf the&nbsp;Web, and&nbsp;play your games with little buttons that go&nbsp;&laquo;click,&#8221; the&nbsp;Epic is&nbsp;your phone. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/12/576/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

