<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DigiCom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digicomgroup.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com</link>
	<description>digital digest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:41:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Genius eFace 2050AF Struggles to&#160;Keep Pace With Other HD&#160;Camcorders</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/06/532/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/06/532/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genius eFace 2050AF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webcam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the&#160;number of&#160;high-definition Webcams grows, products need more than a&#160;low price to&#160;distinguish themselves. I&#160;took the&#160;Genius eFace 2050AF ($40 as&#160;of August 6, 2010) for&#160;a test run, and&#160;found that it&#160;fell short of&#160;the competition in&#160;design and&#160;overall performance.
The eFace 2050AF supports 720p HD&#160;video chat at&#160;a paltry 9&#160;frames per&#160;second (some competing Webcams managed frame rates of&#160;30 fps&#160;in high definition). Unfortunately, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the&nbsp;number of&nbsp;high-definition Webcams grows, products need more than a&nbsp;low price to&nbsp;distinguish themselves. I&nbsp;took the&nbsp;Genius eFace 2050AF ($40 as&nbsp;of August 6, 2010) for&nbsp;a test run, and&nbsp;found that it&nbsp;fell short of&nbsp;the competition in&nbsp;design and&nbsp;overall performance.<span id="more-532"></span></p>
<p>The eFace 2050AF supports 720p HD&nbsp;video chat at&nbsp;a paltry 9&nbsp;frames per&nbsp;second (some competing Webcams managed frame rates of&nbsp;30 fps&nbsp;in high definition). Unfortunately, the&nbsp;limited frame rate translated into choppy video.</p>
<p>The unit can&nbsp;capture 8-megapixel still images, has&nbsp;a built-in microphone and&nbsp;an AF&nbsp;glass lens, and&nbsp;incorporates a&nbsp;360-degree swivel and&nbsp;a 125-degree up-and-down tilt. It&nbsp;works in&nbsp;accordance with Genius&#8217;s CrazyTalk software, so&nbsp;be sure to&nbsp;load the&nbsp;program before plugging in&nbsp;your Webcam.</p>
<p>The eFace 2050AF is&nbsp;compact and&nbsp;circular, with a&nbsp;dual-hinged pop-up frame. The&nbsp;bottom portion anchors the&nbsp;Webcam to&nbsp;your laptop or&nbsp;monitor, the&nbsp;middle section rests on&nbsp;top of&nbsp;your screen, and&nbsp;the top&nbsp;portion holds the&nbsp;lens. The&nbsp;design is&nbsp;clever and&nbsp;sets it&nbsp;apart from other HD&nbsp;Webcams, but&nbsp;because the&nbsp;device is&nbsp;so lightweight, I&nbsp;had trouble getting it&nbsp;to stay in&nbsp;place-it felt as&nbsp;though it&nbsp;were lightly resting on&nbsp;the monitor instead of&nbsp;firmly locking to&nbsp;it. It&#8217;s much better suited to&nbsp;desktop PCs&nbsp;than to&nbsp;laptops.</p>
<p>Another flaw in&nbsp;the design involves the&nbsp;unit&#8217;s 360-degree rotation: What should be&nbsp;a positive feature of&nbsp;the eFace 2050 is&nbsp;actually a&nbsp;hindrance. The&nbsp;USB cable attaches to&nbsp;the back of&nbsp;the camera, so&nbsp;if you&nbsp;do swivel it&nbsp;around the&nbsp;full 360&nbsp;degrees, the&nbsp;cord wraps around the&nbsp;device and&nbsp;eventually covers the&nbsp;lens. Also, turning the&nbsp;lens causes the&nbsp;base to&nbsp;detach from your monitor, forcing you&nbsp;to reclip, readjust, and&nbsp;then try&nbsp;to spin it&nbsp;again. And&nbsp;unlike the&nbsp;Microsoft LifeCam HD-6000, the&nbsp;eFace 2050 does not&nbsp;rotate fluidly; instead, it&nbsp;has several stopping points that produce a&nbsp;jarring effect that all&nbsp;of my&nbsp;conferencers commented on.</p>
<p>The eFace 2050&#8217;s software is&nbsp;stored on&nbsp;a CD-ROM, but&nbsp;setting up&nbsp;the Crazy Cam&nbsp;features can&nbsp;take a&nbsp;while. I&nbsp;recommend giving yourself a&nbsp;good 20&nbsp;minutes to&nbsp;get the&nbsp;software up&nbsp;and running. The&nbsp;basic system requirements for&nbsp;using this Webcam are&nbsp;a 2,4-GHz Pentium 4&nbsp;CPU, Windows XP&nbsp;or higher, and&nbsp;DirectX 9,0 or&nbsp;above.</p>
<p>The default settings on&nbsp;the eFace 2050 are&nbsp;extremely bright, and&nbsp;altering them to&nbsp;make the&nbsp;displayed image seem more natural results in&nbsp;color distortion. Despite tweaking the&nbsp;manual settings several times and&nbsp;playing around with different rooms and&nbsp;light settings, I&nbsp;never found the&nbsp;magic combination to&nbsp;eliminate both these problems. Lowering the&nbsp;contrast and&nbsp;raising the&nbsp;saturation a&nbsp;bit was&nbsp;the best I&nbsp;could do, but&nbsp;even then brightness and&nbsp;color remained problematic.</p>
<p>Though I&nbsp;noticed a&nbsp;delay and&nbsp;drag in&nbsp;movement, the&nbsp;autofocus worked accurately and&nbsp;subtly, free of&nbsp;the distracting flicker that I&#8217;ve encountered with other HD&nbsp;Webcams I&#8217;ve tested recently. However, the&nbsp;eFace 2050&#8217;s slow movement capture largely overshadows the&nbsp;smoothness of&nbsp;its autofocus.</p>
<p>The CrazyTalk Cam&nbsp;software&#8217;s special features are&nbsp;extensive and&nbsp;permit you&nbsp;to record and&nbsp;share videos and&nbsp;simple screenshot captures easily. The&nbsp;softwares avatar creation feature lets you&nbsp;turn any&nbsp;photo into an&nbsp;animated cartoon. You&nbsp;can make the&nbsp;image talk and&nbsp;add motion or&nbsp;sound effects (such as&nbsp;animal sounds or&nbsp;voice warping). These features are&nbsp;fun,but it&nbsp;takes effort to&nbsp;make the&nbsp;animation look crisp.</p>
<p>Overall, the&nbsp;Genius eFace 2050AF is&nbsp;no match for&nbsp;some similarly priced cameras-in particular, the&nbsp;Microsoft LifeCam HD-6000, which also features a&nbsp;360-degree rotational swivel. The&nbsp;eFace 2050AF&#8217;s mediocre HD&nbsp;video quality, poor design, and&nbsp;lackluster color features keep it&nbsp;from being a&nbsp;star.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/06/532/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Little League World Series 2010 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/05/514/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/05/514/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Little League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Series 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s no&#160;doubt that sports games have lost the&#160;simplicity that made them so&#160;accessible back in&#160;the days of&#160;the Genesis and&#160;Super Nintendo, when player models were nothing more than 2D&#160;sprites on&#160;the screen. In&#160;those days the&#160;expectation for&#160;a realistic depiction of&#160;the sport was&#160;minimal. 
That has&#160;changed recently and&#160;has sadly left the&#160;younger generation of&#160;gamers without much of&#160;a footing in&#160;the sports world. That&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no&nbsp;doubt that sports games have lost the&nbsp;simplicity that made them so&nbsp;accessible back in&nbsp;the days of&nbsp;the Genesis and&nbsp;Super Nintendo, when player models were nothing more than 2D&nbsp;sprites on&nbsp;the screen. In&nbsp;those days the&nbsp;expectation for&nbsp;a realistic depiction of&nbsp;the sport was&nbsp;minimal. <span id="more-514"></span></p>
<p>That has&nbsp;changed recently and&nbsp;has sadly left the&nbsp;younger generation of&nbsp;gamers without much of&nbsp;a footing in&nbsp;the sports world. That&#8217;s where Little League World Series 2010 (LLWS 2010) comes into the&nbsp;picture with its&nbsp;simple gameplay and&nbsp;easy-to-learn feature set. There&#8217;s no&nbsp;doubt that it&#8217;s lacking in&nbsp;many of&nbsp;the hardcore baseball areas, but&nbsp;as a&nbsp;casual title meant for&nbsp;newcomers to&nbsp;the sport, I&nbsp;think there just might be&nbsp;enough to&nbsp;warrant your time.</p>
<p>The two&nbsp;most complicated elements for&nbsp;the MLB&nbsp;2K series&nbsp;&#8212; hitting and&nbsp;pitching&nbsp;&#8212; have been simplified significantly in&nbsp;LLWS 2010. They both hinge on&nbsp;you holding and&nbsp;releasing the&nbsp;right trigger at&nbsp;a certain time. For&nbsp;hitting, holding the&nbsp;right trigger starts a&nbsp;simple power meter that, if&nbsp;timed just right, will get&nbsp;you maximum power when you&nbsp;release the&nbsp;trigger. Pitching works in&nbsp;an almost identical way, but&nbsp;has been handcuffed further by&nbsp;the fact that every pitcher has&nbsp;the same offering of&nbsp;three pitches and&nbsp;you can&nbsp;only move the&nbsp;pitch&#8217;s location right or&nbsp;left. Fielding is&nbsp;automated, your only worry being to&nbsp;throw the&nbsp;ball to&nbsp;the correct base and&nbsp;making sure to&nbsp;wiggle the&nbsp;right analog stick to&nbsp;light a&nbsp;fire under your players&#8217; butts (read: make them run&nbsp;faster). If&nbsp;you can&#8217;t tell by&nbsp;now, the&nbsp;gameplay in&nbsp;Little League World Series is&nbsp;extraordinarily simple with only the&nbsp;most basic of&nbsp;actions left up&nbsp;to the&nbsp;player. In&nbsp;other words, if&nbsp;you&#8217;ve never touched a&nbsp;baseball game before, this one&nbsp;is for&nbsp;you.</p>
<p>Adding a&nbsp;bit of&nbsp;spice to&nbsp;the mix&nbsp;is the&nbsp;inclusion of&nbsp;power ups&nbsp;and talent cards. Talent cards can&nbsp;be played at&nbsp;any time during the&nbsp;game to&nbsp;give your players certain abilities or&nbsp;detracting from the&nbsp;abilities of&nbsp;the opposing team. You&nbsp;can earn a&nbsp;binder full of&nbsp;more than 50&nbsp;cards, five of&nbsp;which can&nbsp;be assigned to&nbsp;any one&nbsp;game. These cards do&nbsp;things like lessen the&nbsp;speed of&nbsp;the other team, increase your hitting power, and&nbsp;make your team run&nbsp;faster as&nbsp;well as&nbsp;other abilities. You&nbsp;can see&nbsp;that the&nbsp;development team knew that the&nbsp;gameplay needed some spicing up, but&nbsp;the talent cards don&#8217;t quite take the&nbsp;step needed to&nbsp;keep things feeling fresh after several hours of&nbsp;play.</p>
<p>The artificial intelligence could also use&nbsp;a bit&nbsp;of work, especially since the&nbsp;game relies on&nbsp;the AI&nbsp;of your teammates for&nbsp;so many crucial actions. Too&nbsp;often players will make bad&nbsp;decisions when running the&nbsp;bases and&nbsp;there&#8217;s an&nbsp;interesting issue when the&nbsp;opposing team hits the&nbsp;ball slowly down the&nbsp;first base line and&nbsp;pulls the&nbsp;first baseman from his&nbsp;post.</p>
<p>Another downer is&nbsp;the general lack of&nbsp;innovation since the&nbsp;game launched on&nbsp;Wii back in&nbsp;2008. Many of&nbsp;the same mechanics make their way&nbsp;into the&nbsp;Xbox 360&nbsp;version with little changes to&nbsp;speak of. At&nbsp;the very least the&nbsp;developers should have added online multiplayer support. Sadly all&nbsp;you get&nbsp;is leaderboard integration and&nbsp;the same offering of&nbsp;mini-games to&nbsp;play locally that we&nbsp;saw on&nbsp;Wii. That doesn&#8217;t take away from the&nbsp;fact that kids will find something to&nbsp;enjoy, but&nbsp;they could&#8217;ve done more to&nbsp;differentiate the&nbsp;two packages.</p>
<p>The only area that has&nbsp;seen a&nbsp;bump when making the&nbsp;transition to&nbsp;the Xbox 360&nbsp;and PlayStation 3&nbsp;is the&nbsp;visuals. They&#8217;ve been nicely bumped up&nbsp;into the&nbsp;HD era&nbsp;and enjoy more detail, brighter colors and&nbsp;a framerate that holds strong throughout. Granted, nothing you&#8217;re going to&nbsp;see should push the&nbsp;system, but&nbsp;that hasn&#8217;t stopped other games in&nbsp;the past from experiencing technical issues for&nbsp;no real reason. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/05/514/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft cries foul on&#160;Yahoo!-Google Japan deal</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/04/522/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/04/522/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft will try&#160;to stop Yahoo! from hooking up&#160;with Google in&#160;Japan.
Bing daddy Microsoft told The&#160;Reg it&#160;will object to&#160;Yahoo! Japan&#8217;s alliance with Google, announced this week, in&#160;a presentation to&#160;Japan&#8217;s Fair Trade Commission.
A Microsoft spokesperson said: &#171;We plan to&#160;present evidence to&#160;the Japanese FTC&#160;explaining why&#160;we believe that this deal is&#160;substantially more harmful to&#160;competition than Google’s deal with Yahoo in&#160;2008 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft will try&nbsp;to stop Yahoo! from hooking up&nbsp;with Google in&nbsp;Japan.<span id="more-522"></span></p>
<p>Bing daddy Microsoft told The&nbsp;Reg it&nbsp;will object to&nbsp;Yahoo! Japan&#8217;s alliance with Google, announced this week, in&nbsp;a presentation to&nbsp;Japan&#8217;s Fair Trade Commission.</p>
<p>A Microsoft spokesperson said: &laquo;We plan to&nbsp;present evidence to&nbsp;the Japanese FTC&nbsp;explaining why&nbsp;we believe that this deal is&nbsp;substantially more harmful to&nbsp;competition than Google’s deal with Yahoo in&nbsp;2008 that the&nbsp;DOJ found to&nbsp;be illegal.&#8221;</p>
<p>Microsoft told All-About-Microsoft&#8217;s Mary-Jo Foley a&nbsp;tie up&nbsp;would give Google virtually 100&nbsp;per cent of&nbsp;all searches in&nbsp;the country and&nbsp;deliver control of&nbsp;all personal searches by&nbsp;consumers and&nbsp;business to&nbsp;the internet&#8217;s biggest search and&nbsp;ads company.</p>
<p>Earlier this week, Yahoo! Japan said it&nbsp;will switch to&nbsp;Google&#8217;s search engine from the&nbsp;one it&nbsp;had developed and&nbsp;would use&nbsp;online advertising and&nbsp;distribution from Google.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a&nbsp;mirror of&nbsp;the agreement between Microsoft and&nbsp;Yahoo! elsewhere in&nbsp;the world, where Yahoo!&#8217;s search and&nbsp;ads platform is&nbsp;being lifted out&nbsp;and Microsoft&#8217;s Bing is&nbsp;being slotted in. The&nbsp;switch-over is&nbsp;due for&nbsp;completion during September and&nbsp;October.</p>
<p>Yahoo! Japan isn&#8217;t a&nbsp;fully owned extension of&nbsp;Yahoo! US. Japanese phone and&nbsp;internet service provider Softbank has&nbsp;a 40&nbsp;per cent stake in&nbsp;the operation with Yahoo! on&nbsp;30 per&nbsp;cent.</p>
<p>Yahoo! Japan has&nbsp;around 50&nbsp;per cent of&nbsp;all searches in&nbsp;Japan, with Google on&nbsp;45 per&nbsp;cent and&nbsp;Microsoft in&nbsp;single digits. <sup>&#174;</sup></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/04/522/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel-McAfee Deal Could Mean Intel-Specific Antivirus Software</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/03/540/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/03/540/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antivirus Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McAfee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel McAfee logo.JPGOne possibility of&#160;an Intel-McAfee partnership may&#160;be antivirus suites specifically coded for&#160;Intel hardware, according to&#160;an analyst briefed by&#160;Intel.
Both the&#160;semiconductor and&#160;security industries are&#160;both trying to&#160;understand what the&#160;proposed combination of&#160;Intel and&#160;McAfee will mean, as&#160;Neil Rubenking&#8217;s poll of&#160;security vendors and&#160;my own&#160;Intel-McAfee analysis point out.
Intel invited analysts to&#160;sit in&#160;on a&#160;conference call on&#160;Thursday, and&#160;one of&#160;my sources, chip analyst Nathan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intel McAfee logo.JPGOne possibility of&nbsp;an Intel-McAfee partnership may&nbsp;be antivirus suites specifically coded for&nbsp;Intel hardware, according to&nbsp;an analyst briefed by&nbsp;Intel.<span id="more-540"></span></p>
<p>Both the&nbsp;semiconductor and&nbsp;security industries are&nbsp;both trying to&nbsp;understand what the&nbsp;proposed combination of&nbsp;Intel and&nbsp;McAfee will mean, as&nbsp;Neil Rubenking&#8217;s poll of&nbsp;security vendors and&nbsp;my own&nbsp;Intel-McAfee analysis point out.</p>
<p>Intel invited analysts to&nbsp;sit in&nbsp;on a&nbsp;conference call on&nbsp;Thursday, and&nbsp;one of&nbsp;my sources, chip analyst Nathan Brookwood of&nbsp;Insight 64, participated. It&#8217;s possible that Intel representatives may&nbsp;be hyper-sensitive to&nbsp;the proposed FTC&nbsp;antitrust settlement; in&nbsp;any event, they took pains to&nbsp;emphasize that the&nbsp;antivirus industry as&nbsp;a whole may&nbsp;actually reap the&nbsp;rewards of&nbsp;such a&nbsp;combination.</p>
<p>The thinking, according to&nbsp;Brookwood, is&nbsp;that over time Intel will begin to&nbsp;integrate more and&nbsp;more security logic into the&nbsp;microprocessor itself. (This has&nbsp;been done to&nbsp;some extent within Intel&#8217;s vPro corporate chipset line, although more and&nbsp;more functionality is&nbsp;being sucked into the&nbsp;microprocessor itself.)</p>
<p>This, in&nbsp;turn, will create a&nbsp;degree of&nbsp;security within Intel processors that rivals, including AMD&nbsp;and Via, lack. (AMD has&nbsp;been suspiciously quiet since the&nbsp;announcement.) Intel&#8217;s argument is&nbsp;that those security vendors will be&nbsp;able to&nbsp;charge more for&nbsp;a &laquo;increased security&raquo; version of&nbsp;their products that ties into that security logic. And&nbsp;that implies that a&nbsp;&laquo;generic&raquo; version of&nbsp;the software will be&nbsp;left for&nbsp;AMD-based machines.</p>
<p>Keep in&nbsp;mind that this is&nbsp;Inte&#8217;s own&nbsp;pitch, though filtered through another source. It&#8217;s a&nbsp;lovely piece of&nbsp;marketing, when you&nbsp;think about it; by&nbsp;convincing antivirus vendors to&nbsp;develop &laquo;premium&raquo; products for&nbsp;the Intel chips, Intel can&nbsp;use the&nbsp;antivirus vendors as&nbsp;free marketing, planting the&nbsp;seed that &laquo;Intel Inside&raquo; is&nbsp;itself a&nbsp;premium brand.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s the&nbsp;consumer retail market. Within the&nbsp;enterprise market, such a&nbsp;move almost seems like a&nbsp;fait accompli.</p>
<p>&laquo;To say&nbsp;that enterprise antivirus is&nbsp;competitive is&nbsp;a great understatement&nbsp;&#8212; it&nbsp;is one&nbsp;of the&nbsp;most competitive segments in&nbsp;technology,&#8221; Alex Eckelberry, president and&nbsp;chief executive of&nbsp;McAfee competitor Sunbelt Software, points out&nbsp;in Neil&#8217;s story.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s true, then eking out&nbsp;a few&nbsp;more dollars per&nbsp;seat will certainly be&nbsp;worth it, especially if&nbsp;Intel is&nbsp;helping to&nbsp;fund development with &laquo;marketing dollars&raquo; or&nbsp;merely development tools. And&nbsp;any IT&nbsp;director worth his&nbsp;salt will surely investigate the&nbsp;possibility of&nbsp;improved performance, especially if&nbsp;he has&nbsp;already committed to&nbsp;a stable of&nbsp;Intel-based PCs.</p>
<p>Granted, this could all&nbsp;be taken out&nbsp;of context. Naturally, I&nbsp;put a&nbsp;request for&nbsp;comment in&nbsp;to Intel. Representatives said Thursday that they did&nbsp;not have any&nbsp;executives available for&nbsp;comment, possibly because I&nbsp;wrote about Intel&#8217;s security focus months before.</p>
<p>Still, it&#8217;s an&nbsp;interesting future direction for&nbsp;the company, and&nbsp;a direction that Intel might have to&nbsp;carefully walk, given the&nbsp;FTC&#8217;s scrutiny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/03/540/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Core i7&#8212;970 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/02/545/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/02/545/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Core i7-970]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Intel released its&#160;groundbreaking Core i7&#8212;980X &#171;Gulftown&#187; CPU&#160;earlier this year, the&#160;first consumer processor to&#160;feature six&#160;cores (and thus operating with 12&#160;threads thanks to&#160;Hyper-Threading), it&#160;blew us&#160;away with its&#160;performance-but its&#160;price gave us&#160;pause. 
Occupying the&#160;typical &#171;Extreme Edition&#187; real estate of&#160;$999, it&#160;remained out&#160;of the&#160;grasp of&#160;any but&#160;the most enthused enthusiasts, meaning its&#160;capabilities wouldn&#8217;t be&#160;realized by&#160;most for&#160;a while yet. It&#160;wasn&#8217;t long until [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Intel released its&nbsp;groundbreaking Core i7&#8212;980X &laquo;Gulftown&raquo; CPU&nbsp;earlier this year, the&nbsp;first consumer processor to&nbsp;feature six&nbsp;cores (and thus operating with 12&nbsp;threads thanks to&nbsp;Hyper-Threading), it&nbsp;blew us&nbsp;away with its&nbsp;performance-but its&nbsp;price gave us&nbsp;pause. <span id="more-545"></span></p>
<p>Occupying the&nbsp;typical &laquo;Extreme Edition&raquo; real estate of&nbsp;$999, it&nbsp;remained out&nbsp;of the&nbsp;grasp of&nbsp;any but&nbsp;the most enthused enthusiasts, meaning its&nbsp;capabilities wouldn&#8217;t be&nbsp;realized by&nbsp;most for&nbsp;a while yet. It&nbsp;wasn&#8217;t long until AMD&nbsp;offered its&nbsp;own six-core CPU&nbsp;with a&nbsp;price better aimed at&nbsp;mainstream buyers, but&nbsp;its performance couldn&#8217;t compare to&nbsp;that of&nbsp;the Core i7&#8212;980X. How&nbsp;long until we&nbsp;saw a&nbsp;six-core Intel chip that more people could afford? The&nbsp;answer has&nbsp;now-sort of-come with the&nbsp;Core i7&#8212;970.</p>
<p>In terms of&nbsp;specs, it&#8217;s a&nbsp;near-exact mirror of&nbsp;the Core i7&#8212;980X. Both have been built using the&nbsp;same 32nm manufacturing process, packing about 1,17 billion transistors on&nbsp;a 240mm2 die. With six&nbsp;cores ready for&nbsp;12 threads, a&nbsp;12MB L3&nbsp;cache, and&nbsp;a 130-watt TDP, the&nbsp;Core i7&#8212;970&#8217;s slight speed differences (3,20-GHz core clock versus the&nbsp;Core i7&#8212;980X&#8217;s 3,33 GHz; 3,46-GHz Turbo Boost speed compared to&nbsp;3,6 GHz) don&#8217;t look particularly significant on&nbsp;paper. The&nbsp;biggest difference between the&nbsp;processors is&nbsp;the unlocked multiplier the&nbsp;Core i7&#8212;980X has&nbsp;and the&nbsp;Core i7&#8212;970 doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>As the&nbsp;Core i7&#8212;970 is&nbsp;priced at&nbsp;$885 (list), it&nbsp;might not&nbsp;seem like you&#8217;re getting a&nbsp;scintillating bargain with the&nbsp;newer chip. So&nbsp;the question becomes: Can&nbsp;you live without the&nbsp;unlocked multiplier? If&nbsp;you can, the&nbsp;Core i7&#8212;970 would seem to&nbsp;be a&nbsp;worthwhile way&nbsp;to save a&nbsp;little money and&nbsp;still get&nbsp;most of&nbsp;the performance benefits of&nbsp;the Extreme Edition chip. But&nbsp;do you? That&#8217;s what we&nbsp;wanted to&nbsp;find out. So&nbsp;we popped a&nbsp;Core i7&#8212;970 in&nbsp;one of&nbsp;our test beds to&nbsp;see whether the&nbsp;reality matched the&nbsp;theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/02/545/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Epic 4G&#160;First Look Review</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/01/492/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/01/492/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 15:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung Epic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems Sprint has&#160;a lot&#160;of confidence in&#160;the new&#160;Samsung Epic 4G. As&#160;part of&#160;Samsung&#8217;s Galaxy S&#160;series of&#160;smartphones, this model is&#160;going to&#160;be the&#160;second handset with WiMAX available from this carrier, with the&#160;HTC EVO&#160;4G being the&#160;other.
The carrier recently sent out&#160;representatives with Epic 4G&#160;in hand to&#160;preview this smartphone for&#160;Brighthand before the&#160;August 31&#160;launch date.  Read on&#160;for my&#160;initial impressions.

BUILD &#038; DESIGN
The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems Sprint has&nbsp;a lot&nbsp;of confidence in&nbsp;the new&nbsp;Samsung Epic 4G. As&nbsp;part of&nbsp;Samsung&#8217;s Galaxy S&nbsp;series of&nbsp;smartphones, this model is&nbsp;going to&nbsp;be the&nbsp;second handset with WiMAX available from this carrier, with the&nbsp;HTC EVO&nbsp;4G being the&nbsp;other.<span id="more-492"></span></p>
<p>The carrier recently sent out&nbsp;representatives with Epic 4G&nbsp;in hand to&nbsp;preview this smartphone for&nbsp;Brighthand before the&nbsp;August 31&nbsp;launch date.  Read on&nbsp;for my&nbsp;initial impressions.</p>
<p><strong><br />
BUILD &#038; DESIGN</strong></p>
<p>The first thing that jumps out&nbsp;about the&nbsp;Epic 4G&nbsp;is the&nbsp;four-inch Super AMOLED display. It&nbsp;looks amazing. The&nbsp;black levels are&nbsp;incredibly deep and&nbsp;the colors vibrant.</p>
<p>The comparison between the&nbsp;Epic 4G&#8217;s Super AMOLED and&nbsp;the EVO&nbsp;4G&#8217;s LCD&nbsp;is reminiscent of&nbsp;SDTV to&nbsp;HDTV&nbsp;&#8212; Super AMOLED is&nbsp;that good.</p>
<p>Also impressive is&nbsp;the speaker. Cranked up&nbsp;all the&nbsp;way, you&nbsp;could hear the&nbsp;YouTube video from outside the&nbsp;conference room where Sprint&#8217;s Mark Elliott demoed the&nbsp;device. It&#8217;s no&nbsp;wonder Sprint and&nbsp;Samsung are&nbsp;marketing the&nbsp;Epic and&nbsp;other Super AMOLED-sporting Galaxy S&nbsp;devices as&nbsp;portable entertainment centers.</p>
<p>Elliott even furthered the&nbsp;pitch by&nbsp;claiming in&nbsp;conversation the&nbsp;Galaxy S&nbsp;is geared toward video and&nbsp;entertainment, while the&nbsp;EVO 4G&nbsp;is great for&nbsp;&laquo;everything else.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Keyboard</strong><br />
Another key&nbsp;difference between the&nbsp;EVO 4G&nbsp;and the&nbsp;Epic 4G&nbsp;is that the&nbsp;Epic has&nbsp;a slide-out QWERTY keyboard in&nbsp;addition to&nbsp;a virtual keyboard and&nbsp;Swype technology. The&nbsp;EVO 4G&nbsp;only has&nbsp;an on-screen keyboard.</p>
<p>The Epic&#8217;s slide-out QWERTY is&nbsp;a chiclet-style keyboard, commonly found on&nbsp;Lenovo, ASUS and&nbsp;Sony netbooks. Chiclet keys resemble the&nbsp;chewing gum&nbsp;of the&nbsp;same name, and&nbsp;are flat with straight edges, resulting in&nbsp;small spaces between the&nbsp;keys. Personally, I&nbsp;prefer the&nbsp;chiclet style as&nbsp;it reduces errant key&nbsp;entries caused by&nbsp;my chubby digits.</p>
<p>The Swype text-entry system is&nbsp;an interesting technology found on&nbsp;handful of&nbsp;Android phones, including some of&nbsp;Verizon&#8217;s Droid models. As&nbsp;the name implies, users can&nbsp;input text by&nbsp;swiping their finger across the&nbsp;screen, moving from key&nbsp;to key. It&nbsp;doesn&#8217;t work in&nbsp;real time, so&nbsp;the inputted text only appears once the&nbsp;swiping is&nbsp;complete.</p>
<p>There is&nbsp;a slight learning curve to&nbsp;the technology, especially for&nbsp;those used to&nbsp;pecking away on&nbsp;a virtual keyboard. But&nbsp;I found it&nbsp;to be&nbsp;both novel and&nbsp;useful, quick and&nbsp;accurate too. It&nbsp;won&#8217;t replace the&nbsp;physical QWERTY as&nbsp;my preferred text input method, but&nbsp;it&#8217;s a&nbsp;solid option.</p>
<p><strong>Look and&nbsp;Feel</strong><br />
The Epic 4G&nbsp;has a&nbsp;bit more width than its&nbsp;Galaxy S&nbsp;cousins, the&nbsp;Samsung Captivate and&nbsp;Samsung Vibrant&nbsp;&#8212; as&nbsp;well as&nbsp;the HTC&nbsp;EVO 4G&nbsp;&#8212; owing to&nbsp;the slide-out keyboard, but&nbsp;I wouldn&#8217;t call it&nbsp;thick. It&nbsp;also felt a&nbsp;tad heavier than the&nbsp;EVO, but&nbsp;it is&nbsp;probably only an&nbsp;ounce or&nbsp;two difference, and&nbsp;it&#8217;s definitely not&nbsp;heavy. It&nbsp;won&#8217;t cause muscle strain or&nbsp;your pants to&nbsp;sag if&nbsp;carried in&nbsp;a pocket.</p>
<p>I think HTC&#8217;s offering has&nbsp;better look than the&nbsp;Epic. The&nbsp;EVO is&nbsp;more industrial with a&nbsp;brushed metal back and&nbsp;rectangular form. The&nbsp;Epic is&nbsp;tucked inside a&nbsp;hard plastic shell with rounded edges. The&nbsp;Epic doesn&#8217;t feel cheap, but&nbsp;the EVO&#8217;s cool metal feels much better in&nbsp;hand. Also, the&nbsp;EVO has&nbsp;a novel kickstand to&nbsp;secure the&nbsp;device on&nbsp;a flat surface for&nbsp;watching videos. I&nbsp;would think the&nbsp;kickstand feature is&nbsp;better suited for&nbsp;the Epic, which is&nbsp;supposed to&nbsp;knock my&nbsp;&laquo;entertainment socks off.&raquo;</p>
<p>It seems Sprint has&nbsp;a lot&nbsp;of confidence in&nbsp;the new&nbsp;Samsung Epic 4G. As&nbsp;part of&nbsp;Samsung&#8217;s Galaxy S&nbsp;series of&nbsp;smartphones, this model is&nbsp;going to&nbsp;be the&nbsp;second handset with WiMAX available from this carrier, with the&nbsp;HTC EVO&nbsp;4G being the&nbsp;other.</p>
<p>The carrier recently sent out&nbsp;representatives with Epic 4G&nbsp;in hand to&nbsp;preview this smartphone for&nbsp;Brighthand before the&nbsp;August 31&nbsp;launch date.  Read on&nbsp;for my&nbsp;initial impressions.</p>
<p><strong><br />
BUILD &#038; DESIGN</strong></p>
<p>The first thing that jumps out&nbsp;about the&nbsp;Epic 4G&nbsp;is the&nbsp;four-inch Super AMOLED display. It&nbsp;looks amazing. The&nbsp;black levels are&nbsp;incredibly deep and&nbsp;the colors vibrant.</p>
<p>The comparison between the&nbsp;Epic 4G&#8217;s Super AMOLED and&nbsp;the EVO&nbsp;4G&#8217;s LCD&nbsp;is reminiscent of&nbsp;SDTV to&nbsp;HDTV&nbsp;&#8212; Super AMOLED is&nbsp;that good.</p>
<p>Also impressive is&nbsp;the speaker. Cranked up&nbsp;all the&nbsp;way, you&nbsp;could hear the&nbsp;YouTube video from outside the&nbsp;conference room where Sprint&#8217;s Mark Elliott demoed the&nbsp;device. It&#8217;s no&nbsp;wonder Sprint and&nbsp;Samsung are&nbsp;marketing the&nbsp;Epic and&nbsp;other Super AMOLED-sporting Galaxy S&nbsp;devices as&nbsp;portable entertainment centers.</p>
<p>Elliott even furthered the&nbsp;pitch by&nbsp;claiming in&nbsp;conversation the&nbsp;Galaxy S&nbsp;is geared toward video and&nbsp;entertainment, while the&nbsp;EVO 4G&nbsp;is great for&nbsp;&laquo;everything else.&#8221;<br />
<strong><br />
Keyboard</strong><br />
Another key&nbsp;difference between the&nbsp;EVO 4G&nbsp;and the&nbsp;Epic 4G&nbsp;is that the&nbsp;Epic has&nbsp;a slide-out QWERTY keyboard in&nbsp;addition to&nbsp;a virtual keyboard and&nbsp;Swype technology. The&nbsp;EVO 4G&nbsp;only has&nbsp;an on-screen keyboard.</p>
<p>The Epic&#8217;s slide-out QWERTY is&nbsp;a chiclet-style keyboard, commonly found on&nbsp;Lenovo, ASUS and&nbsp;Sony netbooks. Chiclet keys resemble the&nbsp;chewing gum&nbsp;of the&nbsp;same name, and&nbsp;are flat with straight edges, resulting in&nbsp;small spaces between the&nbsp;keys. Personally, I&nbsp;prefer the&nbsp;chiclet style as&nbsp;it reduces errant key&nbsp;entries caused by&nbsp;my chubby digits.</p>
<p>The Swype text-entry system is&nbsp;an interesting technology found on&nbsp;handful of&nbsp;Android phones, including some of&nbsp;Verizon&#8217;s Droid models. As&nbsp;the name implies, users can&nbsp;input text by&nbsp;swiping their finger across the&nbsp;screen, moving from key&nbsp;to key. It&nbsp;doesn&#8217;t work in&nbsp;real time, so&nbsp;the inputted text only appears once the&nbsp;swiping is&nbsp;complete.</p>
<p>There is&nbsp;a slight learning curve to&nbsp;the technology, especially for&nbsp;those used to&nbsp;pecking away on&nbsp;a virtual keyboard. But&nbsp;I found it&nbsp;to be&nbsp;both novel and&nbsp;useful, quick and&nbsp;accurate too. It&nbsp;won&#8217;t replace the&nbsp;physical QWERTY as&nbsp;my preferred text input method, but&nbsp;it&#8217;s a&nbsp;solid option.<br />
<strong><br />
Look and&nbsp;Feel</strong><br />
The Epic 4G&nbsp;has a&nbsp;bit more width than its&nbsp;Galaxy S&nbsp;cousins, the&nbsp;Samsung Captivate and&nbsp;Samsung Vibrant&nbsp;&#8212; as&nbsp;well as&nbsp;the HTC&nbsp;EVO 4G&nbsp;&#8212; owing to&nbsp;the slide-out keyboard, but&nbsp;I wouldn&#8217;t call it&nbsp;thick. It&nbsp;also felt a&nbsp;tad heavier than the&nbsp;EVO, but&nbsp;it is&nbsp;probably only an&nbsp;ounce or&nbsp;two difference, and&nbsp;it&#8217;s definitely not&nbsp;heavy. It&nbsp;won&#8217;t cause muscle strain or&nbsp;your pants to&nbsp;sag if&nbsp;carried in&nbsp;a pocket.</p>
<p>I think HTC&#8217;s offering has&nbsp;better look than the&nbsp;Epic. The&nbsp;EVO is&nbsp;more industrial with a&nbsp;brushed metal back and&nbsp;rectangular form. The&nbsp;Epic is&nbsp;tucked inside a&nbsp;hard plastic shell with rounded edges. The&nbsp;Epic doesn&#8217;t feel cheap, but&nbsp;the EVO&#8217;s cool metal feels much better in&nbsp;hand. Also, the&nbsp;EVO has&nbsp;a novel kickstand to&nbsp;secure the&nbsp;device on&nbsp;a flat surface for&nbsp;watching videos. I&nbsp;would think the&nbsp;kickstand feature is&nbsp;better suited for&nbsp;the Epic, which is&nbsp;supposed to&nbsp;knock my&nbsp;&laquo;entertainment socks off.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>PERFORMANCE<br />
</strong><br />
The Samsung Epic 4G&nbsp;runs Google Android OS&nbsp;2,1 on&nbsp;a 1&nbsp;GHz Cortex A8&nbsp;Hummingbird processor, and&nbsp;Sprint&#8217;s Elliott mentioned at&nbsp;Android 2,2 is&nbsp;coming to&nbsp;the Epic soon.</p>
<p>In a&nbsp;word, it&#8217;s fast. At&nbsp;least the&nbsp;unit I&nbsp;used was&nbsp;fast. Reviews of&nbsp;similar Samsung devices, the&nbsp;Vibrant and&nbsp;Captivate, described the&nbsp;performance as&nbsp;acceptable, but&nbsp;not stellar, and&nbsp;mentioned that those particular handsets heated up&nbsp;with heavy use.</p>
<p>That said, I&nbsp;was able to&nbsp;breeze through home screens, launch applications, browse the&nbsp;web, and&nbsp;stream YouTube HQ&nbsp;videos with little to&nbsp;no lag, and&nbsp;zero heat emission. Of&nbsp;course, I&nbsp;didn&#8217;t have the&nbsp;time to&nbsp;push the&nbsp;Epic to&nbsp;its limits. Still, I&nbsp;was impressed with both the&nbsp;device and&nbsp;web speed; and&nbsp;this in&nbsp;an office where Sprint reception is&nbsp;spotty at&nbsp;best, and&nbsp;4G coverage is&nbsp;nonexistent.</p>
<p><strong>Samsung Epic 4G&nbsp;from SprintMore to&nbsp;Come</strong><br />
The Epic 4G&nbsp;is loaded with features, and&nbsp;I barely scratched the&nbsp;surface with what it&nbsp;can do. I&nbsp;did not&nbsp;get a&nbsp;chance to&nbsp;try out&nbsp;the 5&nbsp;Megapixel on-board camera or&nbsp;720p video. Nor&nbsp;did I&nbsp;video conference, play Android games or&nbsp;test out&nbsp;data sharing with five devices via&nbsp;Wi-Fi. And&nbsp;I certainly did&nbsp;not get&nbsp;a chance to&nbsp;drain the&nbsp;battery or&nbsp;play with the&nbsp;light sensor that automatically adjusts screen brightness according to&nbsp;the lighting conditions.</p>
<p>Rest assured that all&nbsp;these features will be&nbsp;explored by&nbsp;the Brighthand expert assigned to&nbsp;review the&nbsp;Epic.<br />
<strong><br />
Epic 4G&nbsp;to Sprint&#8217;s Rescue?</strong><br />
Sprint won&#8217;t be&nbsp;the only 4G&nbsp;carrier for&nbsp;much longer&nbsp;&#8212; Rival Verizon is&nbsp;poised to&nbsp;roll out&nbsp;its 4G&nbsp;LTE network in&nbsp;25 to&nbsp;30 markets by&nbsp;the end&nbsp;of 2010, and&nbsp;AT&#038;T (also LTE) will soon have a&nbsp;soft-rollout of&nbsp;their own&nbsp;4G service.</p>
<p>With that in&nbsp;mind, it&#8217;s a&nbsp;problem for&nbsp;Sprint that it&#8217;s only current WiMAX model, the&nbsp;HTC EVO&nbsp;4G is&nbsp;marked as&nbsp;&laquo;sold out,&#8221; on&nbsp;its website, and&nbsp;has been since late June. Customers want 4G, and&nbsp;if Sprint can&#8217;t provide it, they may&nbsp;move to&nbsp;other carriers with their own&nbsp;latest and&nbsp;greatest devices.</p>
<p>As Elliott explained, the&nbsp;Epic 4G&nbsp;should satiate some of&nbsp;that demand when it&#8217;s released later this month. Judging from the&nbsp;warm reviews the&nbsp;other Samsung Galaxy smarphones received and&nbsp;my initial impressions, the&nbsp;Epic 4G&nbsp;could well be&nbsp;an excellent alternative to&nbsp;the popular EVO&nbsp;4G. Check back soon for&nbsp;the full review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/01/492/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nokia E73&#160;Mode Review</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/31/497/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/31/497/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia E73]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though Nokia has&#160;had a&#160;hard time cracking the&#160;North American market, the&#160;products it&#160;does manage to&#160;release are&#160;very competitive in&#160;the market, and&#160;can sometimes even be&#160;surprisingly so.
The Nokia E73&#160;Mode is&#160;one of&#160;the latest devices to&#160;come from the&#160;Finnish mobile maker, and&#160;this T-Mobile-specific iteration packs a&#160;good deal of&#160;power and&#160;substance for&#160;all types of&#160;users.
DESIGN &#038; BUILD
One of&#160;the thinnest mobile devices today (0,4 in&#160;or 10&#160;mm), [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though Nokia has&nbsp;had a&nbsp;hard time cracking the&nbsp;North American market, the&nbsp;products it&nbsp;does manage to&nbsp;release are&nbsp;very competitive in&nbsp;the market, and&nbsp;can sometimes even be&nbsp;surprisingly so.<span id="more-497"></span></p>
<p>The Nokia E73&nbsp;Mode is&nbsp;one of&nbsp;the latest devices to&nbsp;come from the&nbsp;Finnish mobile maker, and&nbsp;this T-Mobile-specific iteration packs a&nbsp;good deal of&nbsp;power and&nbsp;substance for&nbsp;all types of&nbsp;users.</p>
<p><strong>DESIGN &#038; BUILD</strong></p>
<p>One of&nbsp;the thinnest mobile devices today (0,4 in&nbsp;or 10&nbsp;mm), the&nbsp;Nokia E73&nbsp;packs a&nbsp;QVGA (320&#215;240) screen and&nbsp;a useful keyboard into a&nbsp;well designed package.</p>
<p>Nokia E73&nbsp;Mode from T-MobileIt&#8217;s been a&nbsp;while since getting my&nbsp;hands on&nbsp;a smartphone with this form factor, and&nbsp;the E73&nbsp;Mode reminded me&nbsp;instantly what I&nbsp;liked about what Nokia&#8217;s done here.</p>
<p>The hard plastic and&nbsp;metal casing feels very solid and&nbsp;high quality.</p>
<p><strong>Screen</strong><br />
Given its&nbsp;enterprise-friendly leanings, the&nbsp;320&#215;240px screen isn&#8217;t going to&nbsp;win many beauty contests. But, it&nbsp;is more than sufficient for&nbsp;most tasks. This screen is&nbsp;transreflective&nbsp;&#8212; meaning that it&nbsp;fares quite well with indoor and&nbsp;outdoor lighting environments.</p>
<p>One of&nbsp;the pleasures during my&nbsp;time with this device was&nbsp;pulling it&nbsp;out to&nbsp;change the&nbsp;music track while bike riding and&nbsp;a sun&nbsp;beaming pretty heavily overhead. Not&nbsp;only was&nbsp;the screen readable, but&nbsp;all tasks were done easily with one&nbsp;hand.<br />
<strong><br />
Keyboard</strong><br />
If not&nbsp;careful, the&nbsp;E73 Mode can&nbsp;be mistaken for&nbsp;a BlackBerry. The&nbsp;front face being dominated by&nbsp;the QWERTY keyboard just tends to&nbsp;do that to&nbsp;people. But&nbsp;putting your fingers on&nbsp;the keys shows there&#8217;s a&nbsp;different personality to&nbsp;the device.</p>
<p>The E73&nbsp;Mode uses a&nbsp;similar layout to&nbsp;the E72&nbsp;(mechanically, these are&nbsp;very similar mobiles) and&nbsp;e63 models. Compared to&nbsp;the previous generation (the E71), the&nbsp;E73 Mode offers slightly more domed keys&nbsp;&#8212; these are&nbsp;easier to&nbsp;press&nbsp;&#8212; and&nbsp;a few&nbsp;additional buttons. The&nbsp;spacebar is&nbsp;made smaller to&nbsp;accommodate these buttons, and&nbsp;aside from going from one&nbsp;device to&nbsp;another, the&nbsp;learning curve for&nbsp;this keyboard is&nbsp;relatively painless.</p>
<p><strong>PERFORMANCE</strong></p>
<p>Given the&nbsp;pace smartphones are&nbsp;developing these days, the&nbsp;Nokia E73&nbsp;Mode&#8217;s software platform is&nbsp;the only negative in&nbsp;an otherwise well-equipped device. The&nbsp;Symbian S60&nbsp;3,2 (Feature Pack 2) platform is&nbsp;indeed old, but&nbsp;Nokia and&nbsp;T-Mobile seem to&nbsp;have pulled out&nbsp;more more than usual from it. Depending on&nbsp;where you&nbsp;are coming from, it&nbsp;can seem antiquated or&nbsp;about right for&nbsp;the times we&nbsp;live in.</p>
<p>Nokia E73&nbsp;Mode from T-MobileWireless<br />
I wanted to&nbsp;see just how&nbsp;well the&nbsp;T-Mobile network has&nbsp;been updated, and&nbsp;so the&nbsp;E73 Mode spent a&nbsp;lot of&nbsp;time streaming music via&nbsp;the third-party application Mobbler. Whether using the&nbsp;single device speaker, or&nbsp;the included headphones, things were fine until hitting the&nbsp;edge of&nbsp;the Charlotte metro area (that 3G&nbsp;to EDGE drop is&nbsp;a doozie). Yet, it&#8217;s only Web&nbsp;access that seemed to&nbsp;suffer on&nbsp;that changeover, voice calls seemed quite unaffected.</p>
<p>The E73&nbsp;Mode also spent time in&nbsp;my pocket and&nbsp;hand during the&nbsp;time I&nbsp;was at&nbsp;the Uplinq conference, and&nbsp;performed very well.</p>
<p><strong>PIM and&nbsp;Messaging</strong><br />
Symbian has&nbsp;a pretty robust PIM&nbsp;(personal information management) suite, and&nbsp;the E73&nbsp;Mode does very well here. There&#8217;s a&nbsp;calendar with integrated tasks and&nbsp;memos; an&nbsp;address book with support for&nbsp;numerous detail fields, contact groups, and&nbsp;tones; and&nbsp;an enhanced notes app&nbsp;called Active Notes.</p>
<p>On the&nbsp;messaging side, there&#8217;s been little need for&nbsp;updated software, as&nbsp;the standard apps are&nbsp;still enough for&nbsp;most users. The&nbsp;Messaging application supports SMS, MMS, and&nbsp;up to&nbsp;10 email accounts (POP or&nbsp;IMAP). Mail for&nbsp;Exchange is&nbsp;available for&nbsp;connecting to&nbsp;Exchange accounts, with support for&nbsp;meeting messages, searching the&nbsp;global address book, and&nbsp;mobile device administration.</p>
<p>Again, its&nbsp;all there, just not&nbsp;as clean as&nbsp;many people might be&nbsp;used to&nbsp;with some other devices. That being said, if&nbsp;an IT&nbsp;department supports multiple devices, what comes out&nbsp;of the&nbsp;box with the&nbsp;E73 is&nbsp;about as&nbsp;close to&nbsp;the BlackBerry experience as&nbsp;it gets.</p>
<p><strong>Web and&nbsp;Multimedia</strong><br />
Where Nokia&#8217;s E-Series devices have consistently gotten better over the&nbsp;years has&nbsp;been in&nbsp;the web&nbsp;and multimedia areas. Not&nbsp;that they used to&nbsp;be unable to&nbsp;perform, just that these areas were not&nbsp;focused on. This changed a&nbsp;good bit&nbsp;with the&nbsp;Nokia E72, and&nbsp;is refined a&nbsp;good bit&nbsp;more with the&nbsp;E73 Mode.</p>
<p>Nokia E73&nbsp;Mode from T-Mobile USAOn the&nbsp;web side, there the&nbsp;versatile Webkit-based Nokia Browser. Running at&nbsp;version 7,2, it&nbsp;features significant improvements to&nbsp;the rendering engine when compared to&nbsp;a recently updated Nokia &#8470;&nbsp;97 and&nbsp;X6, and&nbsp;an update to&nbsp;the Flash Lite plugin (version 4).</p>
<p>I must say&nbsp;that I&nbsp;was impressed every time I&nbsp;opened up&nbsp;the browser&nbsp;&#8212; no&nbsp;Symbian device had&nbsp;ever responded that well, especially on&nbsp;pages with several JavaScript pop-ups or&nbsp;non-mobile-optimized AJAX. Nokia even tweaked the&nbsp;default font-size to&nbsp;make it&nbsp;readable without adjustments.</p>
<p>Using the&nbsp;various number shortcuts for&nbsp;things such as&nbsp;typing in&nbsp;a link, making a&nbsp;bookmark, or&nbsp;zooming out&nbsp;for a&nbsp;page overview to&nbsp;navigate longer/wider pages made for&nbsp;a pleasing browsing experience. I&nbsp;was genuinely surprised. And&nbsp;T-Mobile&#8217;s 3G&nbsp;network didn&#8217;t give me&nbsp;any reason to&nbsp;frown.</p>
<p>Besides the&nbsp;browser, there&#8217;s the&nbsp;Google Mobile Apps and&nbsp;YouTube apps, and&nbsp;link stubs for&nbsp;Facebook, Twitter, and&nbsp;MySpace. As&nbsp;with other E-Series devices, the&nbsp;multi-protocol IM&nbsp;application is&nbsp;also included (Windows Live, AIM, GTalk, MySpace IM, and&nbsp;Yahoo compatibility).</p>
<p><strong>Other Apps and&nbsp;Impressions</strong><br />
Other apps on&nbsp;the E73&nbsp;Mode include a&nbsp;currency/measures converter and&nbsp;support for&nbsp;encrypting both the&nbsp;phone memory and&nbsp;memory cards.</p>
<p>In terms of&nbsp;location-based apps, there&#8217;s Ovi&nbsp;Maps, Where (a location-based search engine), and&nbsp;TeleNav. I&nbsp;preferred Ovi&nbsp;Maps for&nbsp;most searches, though I&nbsp;could see&nbsp;the appeal of&nbsp;Where for&nbsp;some inquiries such as&nbsp;&laquo;what&#8217;s going on&nbsp;this holiday weekend.&#8221;</p>
<p>When I&nbsp;was at&nbsp;the Uplinq conference, I&nbsp;enjoyed demonstrating the&nbsp;included Multiscanner application, which is&nbsp;able to&nbsp;read business cards (mostly) well. The&nbsp;E73 Mode&#8217;s 5&nbsp;megapixel camera was&nbsp;a big&nbsp;help here, though cards which are&nbsp;a more artistic than informational fare are&nbsp;hard for&nbsp;this application to&nbsp;use.</p>
<p>The E73&nbsp;Mode isn&#8217;t free of&nbsp;the odd&nbsp;or welcomed carrier addition. Visual Voicemail makes a&nbsp;welcomed appearance here. The&nbsp;Ovi Store application supports carrier billing&nbsp;&#8212; so&nbsp;one should be&nbsp;mindful of&nbsp;the .99 cents here and&nbsp;there apps, themes, and&nbsp;media which can&nbsp;be downloaded.</p>
<p>Nokia E73&nbsp;Mode from T-Mobile USALastly, the&nbsp;Switch mode came in&nbsp;handy, but&nbsp;only when I&nbsp;remembered that it&nbsp;was there. It&nbsp;would make so&nbsp;much more sense if&nbsp;Switch&nbsp;&#8212; an&nbsp;application which changes the&nbsp;homescreen, theme, and&nbsp;sounds&nbsp;&#8212; could act&nbsp;on a&nbsp;more contextual or&nbsp;automated fashion. I&nbsp;fear that its&nbsp;usefulness will be&nbsp;appreciated, but&nbsp;lost when someone forgets that its&nbsp;there.<br />
<strong><br />
Camera</strong><br />
An important part of&nbsp;the Nokia E73&nbsp;Mode&#8217;s multimedia abilities is&nbsp;a 5&nbsp;megapixel camera. Besides some noise in&nbsp;pictures with heavier greens and&nbsp;reds, I&nbsp;saw nothing but&nbsp;quality shots throughout.</p>
<p>The Share Online application is&nbsp;included, making for&nbsp;a quick upload to&nbsp;Flickr, Ovi&nbsp;Share, or&nbsp;Vox photoblogs, while a&nbsp;third party application Shozu is&nbsp;able to&nbsp;export to&nbsp;even more services.</p>
<p>With the&nbsp;E73 Mode&#8217;s relatively low&nbsp;resolution screen, it&#8217;s advisable to&nbsp;make sure to&nbsp;check your pictures on&nbsp;a larger screen before posting them, as&nbsp;some shots look much better on&nbsp;the smaller screen than in&nbsp;near-actual size.</p>
<p><strong>Battery</strong><br />
With normal use, I&nbsp;was charging the&nbsp;E73 Mode&#8217;s 1500 mAh&nbsp;battery every other night. Nokia has&nbsp;done very well to&nbsp;wring out&nbsp;all kinds of&nbsp;efficiency from the&nbsp;hardware, without increasing the&nbsp;weight, while increasing the&nbsp;software performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/31/497/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cybercrooks deceive users to&#160;uninstall their true anti-virus software</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/30/534/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/30/534/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybercrooks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new&#160;malware was&#160;developed by&#160;cyber crooks to&#160;lure unwitting users into uninstalling legitimate anti-virus applications and&#160;instead using fake and&#160;useless software. A&#160;bogus package dubbed AnVi Antivirus generates a&#160;message that suggest that legitimate apps are&#160;&#171;uncertified&#187; and&#160;ought to&#160;be removed. Further the&#160;message threatens that if&#160;a user fails to&#160;take action his/her computer performance will degrade.
Besides, the&#160;fake application will also try&#160;to remove legitimate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new&nbsp;malware was&nbsp;developed by&nbsp;cyber crooks to&nbsp;lure unwitting users into uninstalling legitimate anti-virus applications and&nbsp;instead using fake and&nbsp;useless software. A&nbsp;bogus package dubbed AnVi Antivirus generates a&nbsp;message that suggest that legitimate apps are&nbsp;&laquo;uncertified&raquo; and&nbsp;ought to&nbsp;be removed. Further the&nbsp;message threatens that if&nbsp;a user fails to&nbsp;take action his/her computer performance will degrade.<span id="more-534"></span></p>
<p>Besides, the&nbsp;fake application will also try&nbsp;to remove legitimate packages from the&nbsp;likes of&nbsp;Microsoft, AVG, Zone Labs and&nbsp;Norton even if&nbsp;users fail to&nbsp;comply with the&nbsp;bogus request to&nbsp;uninstall authentic quality security software. Certainly, the&nbsp;true anti-virus application will black such activity. But&nbsp;if your definition bases are&nbsp;obsolete the&nbsp;attack may&nbsp;work.</p>
<p>If successful, AnVi Antivirus will download fake anti-virus software that warns of&nbsp;multiple imaginary security threats in&nbsp;a bid&nbsp;to trick victims into purchasing worse-than-useless software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/30/534/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LG Ally Review</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/29/501/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/29/501/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG Ally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QWERTY]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Android OSThe LG&#160;Ally is&#160;a inexpensive slider-style phone with a&#160;physical QWERTY keyboard, a&#160;3,2 megapixel camera with flash, Wi-Fi and&#160;Bluetooth wireless networking.
It runs Google&#8217;s Android OS&#160;2,1, and&#160;costs just $100 with a&#160;new two-year contract with Verizon Wireless, or&#160;just $50 if&#160;purchased on&#160;the carrier&#8217;s website.
BUILD &#038; DESIGN:

The basic design aesthetic for&#160;the Ally is&#160;modern and&#160;functional. It&#8217;s black, and&#160;it is&#160;very solidly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Android OSThe LG&nbsp;Ally is&nbsp;a inexpensive slider-style phone with a&nbsp;physical QWERTY keyboard, a&nbsp;3,2 megapixel camera with flash, Wi-Fi and&nbsp;Bluetooth wireless networking.<span id="more-501"></span></p>
<p>It runs Google&#8217;s Android OS&nbsp;2,1, and&nbsp;costs just $100 with a&nbsp;new two-year contract with Verizon Wireless, or&nbsp;just $50 if&nbsp;purchased on&nbsp;the carrier&#8217;s website.</p>
<p><strong>BUILD &#038; DESIGN:<br />
</strong><br />
The basic design aesthetic for&nbsp;the Ally is&nbsp;modern and&nbsp;functional. It&#8217;s black, and&nbsp;it is&nbsp;very solidly built. It&#8217;s about the&nbsp;same size as&nbsp;the HTC&nbsp;Droid Incredible and&nbsp;other premium phones, but&nbsp;somewhat thicker due&nbsp;to the&nbsp;QWERTY keyboard under the&nbsp;display. There is&nbsp;absolutely no&nbsp;&laquo;wiggle&raquo; whatsoever when you&nbsp;slide out&nbsp;the keyboard, and&nbsp;it locks firmly open when you&nbsp;slide up&nbsp;the display.</p>
<p>LG Ally from Verizon WirelessOverall the&nbsp;Ally would be&nbsp;a good choice for&nbsp;an older teen or&nbsp;a fumble-fingered adult, because it&nbsp;seems much sturdier than some of&nbsp;the other current smartphone options.</p>
<p>Even though it&#8217;s a&nbsp;bit thick compared to&nbsp;other phones, it&nbsp;still feels good in&nbsp;the hand and&nbsp;is definitely pocketable. However, if&nbsp;you&#8217;re a&nbsp;lady who&nbsp;dresses professionally for&nbsp;work, you&nbsp;may prefer to&nbsp;keep the&nbsp;Ally in&nbsp;your purse or&nbsp;briefcase to&nbsp;avoid the&nbsp;bulge in&nbsp;your dress slacks; folks in&nbsp;more casual attire won&#8217;t mind keeping the&nbsp;device in&nbsp;their pocket.</p>
<p><strong>Display</strong><br />
The display looks nice, though perhaps not&nbsp;quite as&nbsp;sharp and&nbsp;blow-you-away gorgeous of&nbsp;other recent devices like the&nbsp;Incredible. Photos look good, though YouTube video was&nbsp;slightly disappointing and&nbsp;grainy.</p>
<p>The screen isn&#8217;t terribly bright either, which means that it&nbsp;will work fine indoors, or&nbsp;in low&nbsp;light conditions, but&nbsp;is almost completely unusable outside in&nbsp;normal to&nbsp;bright sunlight.</p>
<p><strong>LG Ally from Verizon with Google Android OSKeyboard</strong><br />
The Ally has&nbsp;one of&nbsp;the best physical keyboards of&nbsp;any of&nbsp;the phones I&#8217;ve reviewed. It&nbsp;usually takes some practice for&nbsp;me to&nbsp;become proficient, because every mobile keyboard is&nbsp;different, and&nbsp;they all&nbsp;have their quirks. But&nbsp;the keys on&nbsp;the LG&nbsp;Ally are&nbsp;large, well-spaced, and&nbsp;have good feedback so&nbsp;you&#8217;re not&nbsp;constantly checking the&nbsp;screen to&nbsp;see if&nbsp;you&#8217;re hitting the&nbsp;right key. They&#8217;re illuminated for&nbsp;use in&nbsp;low light conditions as&nbsp;well.</p>
<p>I like the&nbsp;fact that this is&nbsp;a four-row keyboard, with a&nbsp;separate number row. My&nbsp;only small complaint about the&nbsp;keyboard is&nbsp;that the&nbsp;text for&nbsp;the alternative keys like punctuation isn&#8217;t quite as&nbsp;easy to&nbsp;read as&nbsp;it is&nbsp;on other keyboards I&#8217;ve tried. I&#8217;m sure that some more time with the&nbsp;device will give me&nbsp;the opportunity to&nbsp;learn where everything is&nbsp;so that I&nbsp;won&#8217;t have to&nbsp;look anymore. though I&nbsp;have to&nbsp;be honest&nbsp;&#8212; I&#8217;m not&nbsp;too worried about punctuation when I&#8217;m texting or&nbsp;emailing.</p>
<p>Other Buttons &#038; Controls<br />
There are&nbsp;four physical buttons underneath the&nbsp;display: call, home, menu, and&nbsp;disconnect, plus pressure-sensitive back and&nbsp;search buttons.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a&nbsp;four-way navigation panel on&nbsp;the lower right side of&nbsp;the keyboard that I&nbsp;really like&nbsp;&#8212; it&nbsp;makes navigation a&nbsp;breeze.</p>
<p>The headphone jack is&nbsp;on the&nbsp;top, the&nbsp;volume buttons and&nbsp;charging port are&nbsp;on the&nbsp;left, and&nbsp;the (fully accessible) microSD slot and&nbsp;camera button are&nbsp;on the&nbsp;right side.</p>
<p><strong>PERFORMANCE:</strong></p>
<p>The LG&nbsp;Ally is&nbsp;quite responsive, which is&nbsp;nice&nbsp;&#8212; there&#8217;s nothing worse than having to&nbsp;wait for&nbsp;my calendar or&nbsp;email to&nbsp;load. I&nbsp;didn&#8217;t have any&nbsp;trouble with the&nbsp;touchscreen either&nbsp;&#8212; where I&nbsp;tapped was&nbsp;where I&nbsp;intended to&nbsp;tap, with no&nbsp;problems launching the&nbsp;wrong app, etc.</p>
<p>LG Ally from Verizon WirelessThe Ally is&nbsp;currently running Android OS&nbsp;2,1, which is&nbsp;both powerful and&nbsp;easy to&nbsp;use.</p>
<p><strong>Wireless/Call Quality</strong><br />
Although my&nbsp;initial call quality testing produced good results, more extensive testing has&nbsp;changed my&nbsp;opinion. Some of&nbsp;my test calls to&nbsp;landline phones sounded good, while others suffered from very poor sound quality with a&nbsp;great deal of&nbsp;background noise. At&nbsp;times there was&nbsp;some annoying clicking in&nbsp;the background.</p>
<p>I experienced the&nbsp;same mixed results when calling other mobile phones, and&nbsp;I was&nbsp;unable to&nbsp;piece together a&nbsp;pattern that explained the&nbsp;results. I&nbsp;typically get&nbsp;very good coverage and&nbsp;call quality from Verizon; my&nbsp;personal phone, the&nbsp;LG Dare, always gets good reception and&nbsp;the voice quality is&nbsp;good.</p>
<p>Wi-Fi works well, and&nbsp;I didn&#8217;t have any&nbsp;connectivity issue with any&nbsp;of the&nbsp;networks I&nbsp;tried.<br />
<strong><br />
LG Ally from Verizon with Google Android OSProductivity</strong><br />
Calendar and&nbsp;contacts apps are&nbsp;included with the&nbsp;LG Ally, but&nbsp;no task management or&nbsp;note taking applications.</p>
<p>A calculator and&nbsp;clock are&nbsp;also included, but&nbsp;the real star here is&nbsp;ThinkFree Office. The&nbsp;app allows you&nbsp;to view PDFs and&nbsp;Microsoft Office documents, whether they are&nbsp;located on&nbsp;your phone or&nbsp;in your Google Docs account. I&nbsp;was able to&nbsp;edit a&nbsp;spreadsheet from Google Docs, but&nbsp;was not&nbsp;able to&nbsp;edit a&nbsp;couple of&nbsp;my word processing documents, and&nbsp;I&#8217;m not&nbsp;sure why.</p>
<p>The Google Maps function works flawlessly, as&nbsp;expected. The&nbsp;app was&nbsp;able to&nbsp;pinpoint my&nbsp;location with a&nbsp;good degree of&nbsp;accuracy and&nbsp;speed, and&nbsp;the turn-by-turn spoken directions were accurate.</p>
<p>Other productivity apps are&nbsp;available for&nbsp;purchase in&nbsp;the Android Market.<br />
<strong><br />
Entertainment</strong><br />
The Android OS&nbsp;web browser performs well with quick page loads and&nbsp;smooth scrolling. Even very complicated web&nbsp;sites with lots of&nbsp;ads and&nbsp;sidebars look good; if&nbsp;you need to&nbsp;zoom in&nbsp;on a&nbsp;particular area you&nbsp;can double tap&nbsp;the display and&nbsp;the text is&nbsp;automatically resized to&nbsp;fit the&nbsp;screen.</p>
<p>The LG&nbsp;Ally&#8217;s voice search feature worked surprisingly well, with accurate voice recognition. Even though this model has&nbsp;a very nice keyboard, voice search can&nbsp;help save a&nbsp;lot of&nbsp;time.</p>
<p>The music players works great, and&nbsp;the sound quality and&nbsp;volume from the&nbsp;external speaker are&nbsp;good.</p>
<p>The Socialite feature aims to&nbsp;improve the&nbsp;social networking experience by&nbsp;integrating your Twitter and&nbsp;Facebook feeds into one&nbsp;unified stream of&nbsp;information. It&nbsp;works well, though it&nbsp;could stand to&nbsp;be faster loading updates.</p>
<p>A standalone MySpace app&nbsp;is also included, as&nbsp;is the&nbsp;Amazon MP3&nbsp;app and&nbsp;the Android Market, where you&nbsp;can download free and&nbsp;paid games and&nbsp;apps to&nbsp;personalize your phone. Whether you&nbsp;want to&nbsp;add music or&nbsp;applications to&nbsp;your phone, the&nbsp;buying process is&nbsp;simple and&nbsp;downloads are&nbsp;fast.<br />
<strong><br />
LG Ally from Verizon with Google Android OSCamera</strong><br />
The 3,2 megapixel camera on&nbsp;the Ally takes acceptable photos in&nbsp;good conditions, but&nbsp;there are&nbsp;some issues with the&nbsp;picture quality.</p>
<p>The camera flash is&nbsp;quite strong and&nbsp;helps to&nbsp;fill in&nbsp;slightly shady areas to&nbsp;help even out&nbsp;exposure, but&nbsp;results were somewhat mixed. Some of&nbsp;the worst exposure problems came up&nbsp;during regular daylight photography while I&nbsp;was outside.</p>
<p>Certain areas of&nbsp;a photo would come out&nbsp;nicely, but&nbsp;if there was&nbsp;strong contrast between the&nbsp;subject and&nbsp;the background, the&nbsp;final results were often overexposed.</p>
<p>The zoom is&nbsp;a nice feature, but&nbsp;the results were less than satisfactory. Zoomed photos are&nbsp;very grainy and&nbsp;of relatively poor quality. Even worse, my&nbsp;LG Dare is&nbsp;a couple of&nbsp;years old&nbsp;now and&nbsp;also has&nbsp;a 3,2 megapixel camera, but&nbsp;takes much better photos.</p>
<p>For those reasons I&nbsp;wouldn&#8217;t suggest that you&nbsp;rely upon the&nbsp;Ally as&nbsp;a general purpose camera; it&nbsp;will work well enough for&nbsp;photos you&nbsp;might otherwise have missed, but&nbsp;you won&#8217;t be&nbsp;taking any&nbsp;prize-winning shots with this device.<br />
<strong><br />
Battery Life</strong><br />
Battery life is&nbsp;quite good; I&nbsp;am able to&nbsp;go for&nbsp;at least two&nbsp;days between charges, and&nbsp;sometimes a&nbsp;bit longer, if&nbsp;I don&#8217;t use&nbsp;the camera too&nbsp;much.</p>
<p>Even after relatively heavy usage with several phone calls and&nbsp;web browsing sessions, plus some photgraphy, I&nbsp;had no&nbsp;problem getting through the&nbsp;day and&nbsp;no real anxiety that I&nbsp;wouldn&#8217;t be&nbsp;able to&nbsp;finish the&nbsp;day before getting home to&nbsp;plug it&nbsp;in and&nbsp;recharge.</p>
<p><strong>CONCLUSION<br />
</strong><br />
LG Ally from Verizon WirelessI really want to&nbsp;like the&nbsp;LG Ally more than I&nbsp;do, but&nbsp;it&#8217;s hard. I&nbsp;like the&nbsp;overall design of&nbsp;the phone, it&#8217;s very solidly built, and&nbsp;the battery life is&nbsp;better than I&nbsp;expected. Unfortunately the&nbsp;display is&nbsp;fine indoors, but&nbsp;unusable outdoors, and&nbsp;the voice quality and&nbsp;camera are&nbsp;somewhat disappointing.</p>
<p>The price is&nbsp;quite reasonable, however, so&nbsp;if you&#8217;re a&nbsp;bargain-conscious consumer you&nbsp;should still consider the&nbsp;Ally. It&#8217;s a&nbsp;solid contender for&nbsp;less than $100, though if&nbsp;you have the&nbsp;opportunity you&nbsp;should try&nbsp;it out&nbsp;in a&nbsp;Verizon store before taking the&nbsp;plunge.<br />
<strong><br />
Pros</strong></p>
<p>    * Really nice keyboard<br />
    * Solid construction<br />
    * Excellent battery life<br />
<strong><br />
Cons</strong></p>
<p>    * Inadequate screen brightness<br />
    * Disappointing camera<br />
    * Call quality issues</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/29/501/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toshiba Portege R700-S1330</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/28/528/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/28/528/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portege R700-S1330]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toshiba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toshiba&#8217;s new&#160;Portégé R700 surprised me&#160;with its&#160;mature styling, serious muscle, and&#160;ridiculously light heft. Despite being a&#160;true ultraportable, this machine is&#160;quite powerful-Toshiba somehow even fit&#160;an optical drive on&#160;it! But&#160;a few&#160;unpleasant surprises make the&#160;whopping $1599 price tag&#160;less appealing.
The 13,3- inch laptop accommodates three USB&#160;plugs (one a&#160;USB/eSATA combo), headphone/microphone jacks, an&#160;HDMI plug, a&#160;VGA plug, an&#160;ethernet port, a&#160;memory stick port, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toshiba&#8217;s new&nbsp;Portégé R700 surprised me&nbsp;with its&nbsp;mature styling, serious muscle, and&nbsp;ridiculously light heft. Despite being a&nbsp;true ultraportable, this machine is&nbsp;quite powerful-Toshiba somehow even fit&nbsp;an optical drive on&nbsp;it! But&nbsp;a few&nbsp;unpleasant surprises make the&nbsp;whopping $1599 price tag&nbsp;less appealing.<span id="more-528"></span></p>
<p>The 13,3- inch laptop accommodates three USB&nbsp;plugs (one a&nbsp;USB/eSATA combo), headphone/microphone jacks, an&nbsp;HDMI plug, a&nbsp;VGA plug, an&nbsp;ethernet port, a&nbsp;memory stick port, an&nbsp;optical drive, a&nbsp;128GB solid-state drive, a&nbsp;Core i7&nbsp;620M running at&nbsp;2,67GHz, and&nbsp;4GB of&nbsp;RAM-all tucked into a&nbsp;12,44-by-8,94-by-0,66-inch frame weighing 3,2 pounds (the rear of&nbsp;the unit fattens out&nbsp;to a&nbsp;width of&nbsp;just over 1&nbsp;inch). That&#8217;s power to&nbsp;spare for&nbsp;most on-the-go users, as&nbsp;reflected in&nbsp;an excellent WorldBench 6&nbsp;score of&nbsp;128. Factor in&nbsp;a battery life of&nbsp;almost 6&nbsp;hours, and&nbsp;you have the&nbsp;makings of&nbsp;a pretty awesome ultraportable laptop.</p>
<p>The screen is&nbsp;a reasonably good LED-backlit matte LCD, filling out&nbsp;a resolution of&nbsp;1366 by&nbsp;768 easily enough. Colors were good, but&nbsp;the R700 struggles to&nbsp;fill large black areas in&nbsp;video. The&nbsp;Intel HD&nbsp;integrated graphics solution is&nbsp;more than adequate for&nbsp;playing modest video; it&nbsp;even playing through the&nbsp;HDMI port without difficulty. Horizontal viewing angles are&nbsp;excellent, but&nbsp;vertical viewing angles most certainly aren&#8217;t. The&nbsp;audio can&#8217;t fill a&nbsp;room, the&nbsp;speakers get&nbsp;a bit&nbsp;shrill at&nbsp;high volume, and&nbsp;there&#8217;s no&nbsp;bass to&nbsp;speak of-so rely on&nbsp;the headphone jack instead.</p>
<p>The laptop&#8217;s black plastic interior complements its&nbsp;black metal lid. The&nbsp;&laquo;Toshiba&raquo; emblazoned on&nbsp;the lid&nbsp;itself, and&nbsp;the two&nbsp;hinges provide silver accents. Almost everything feels very sturdy, and&nbsp;the keys have remarkably little flex. The&nbsp;display lid, however, is&nbsp;a bit&nbsp;too thin and&nbsp;flexible.</p>
<p>The R700&#8217;s gigantic touchpad invites occasional accidental contact, but&nbsp;none of&nbsp;the touchpad responses I&nbsp;triggered slowed my&nbsp;work on&nbsp;the machine significantly. If&nbsp;it does become an&nbsp;annoyance, you&nbsp;can tap&nbsp;a handy little button between the&nbsp;keyboard and&nbsp;the touchpad to&nbsp;deactivate the&nbsp;touchpad altogether (or to&nbsp;toggle it&nbsp;back on).</p>
<p>Unfortunately, this laptop has&nbsp;three major drawbacks. Foremost among these is&nbsp;the keyboard, whose Chiclet-style keys are&nbsp;incredibly far&nbsp;apart and&nbsp;mushy to&nbsp;the touch. Second, the&nbsp;powerful technology packed in&nbsp;the small space generated quite a&nbsp;bit of&nbsp;heat along the&nbsp;left edge and&nbsp;bottom of&nbsp;the machine. And&nbsp;third, the&nbsp;fan used to&nbsp;dissipate the&nbsp;heat was&nbsp;noisy. For&nbsp;me, these shortcomings made using the&nbsp;R700 less comfortable, but&nbsp;they weren&#8217;t deal breakers.</p>
<p>The R700 is&nbsp;a fantastic machine for&nbsp;a specific niche: laptop users who&nbsp;want to&nbsp;combine lots of&nbsp;power with extremely light weight. If&nbsp;you want to&nbsp;change the&nbsp;specific components, Toshiba makes it&nbsp;very easy to&nbsp;customize your machine when you&nbsp;order it&nbsp;(I would drop the&nbsp;solid-state drive in&nbsp;favor of&nbsp;a bit&nbsp;more storage on&nbsp;a traditional hard-disk drive, for&nbsp;example).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/28/528/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
