<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DigiCom &#187; Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digicomgroup.com/category/internet/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com</link>
	<description>digital digest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:11:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google taps State Dept. vet&#160;for Google Ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/08/566/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/08/566/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 18:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google plans to&#160;launch a&#160;new policy organization called Google Ideas, which appears to&#160;be a&#160;Googley take on&#160;the think tank.
Jared Cohen, who&#160;until recently was&#160;employed by&#160;the U.S. Department of&#160;State, will lead the&#160;new division of&#160;Google starting in&#160;mid-October, he&#160;said in&#160;an interview with Foreign Policy magazine tweeted by&#160;Google CEO&#160;Eric Schmidt. Cohen has&#160;been known as&#160;a digital guru for&#160;the State Department, helping focus attention [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google plans to&nbsp;launch a&nbsp;new policy organization called Google Ideas, which appears to&nbsp;be a&nbsp;Googley take on&nbsp;the think tank.<span id="more-566"></span></p>
<p>Jared Cohen, who&nbsp;until recently was&nbsp;employed by&nbsp;the U.S. Department of&nbsp;State, will lead the&nbsp;new division of&nbsp;Google starting in&nbsp;mid-October, he&nbsp;said in&nbsp;an interview with Foreign Policy magazine tweeted by&nbsp;Google CEO&nbsp;Eric Schmidt. Cohen has&nbsp;been known as&nbsp;a digital guru for&nbsp;the State Department, helping focus attention within the&nbsp;government on&nbsp;emerging social-media technologies like YouTube and&nbsp;Twitter.</p>
<p>Google Ideas will examine a&nbsp;wide range of&nbsp;issues, according to&nbsp;Cohen: &#8220;&#8230; the&nbsp;range of&nbsp;challenges that it&nbsp;may focus on&nbsp;include everything from the&nbsp;sort of&nbsp;hard challenges like counterterrorism, counterradicalization, and&nbsp;nonproliferation, to&nbsp;some of&nbsp;the ones people might expect it&nbsp;to focus on, like development and&nbsp;citizen empowerment.&raquo; Cohen is&nbsp;calling this a&nbsp;&laquo;think/do tank&raquo; in&nbsp;the sense that Google Ideas will attempt to&nbsp;put some of&nbsp;the concepts it&nbsp;generates into action by&nbsp;working with government and&nbsp;third-party organizations.</p>
<p>Google already operates Google.org as&nbsp;an idea factory for&nbsp;topics a&nbsp;little outside of&nbsp;its core business, such as&nbsp;Google PowerMeter and&nbsp;Google Flu&nbsp;Trends. And&nbsp;Schmidt is&nbsp;a member of&nbsp;the Council of&nbsp;Advisers on&nbsp;Science and&nbsp;Technology, which provides advice on&nbsp;technology issues to&nbsp;President Obama.</p>
<p>Google and&nbsp;the State Department bonded earlier this year over Google&#8217;s dispute with China over censored search results, leading to&nbsp;a policy speech on&nbsp;Internet freedom by&nbsp;Secretary of&nbsp;State Hillary Clinton that invoked Google on&nbsp;several occasions. Last year, Cohen was&nbsp;said to&nbsp;be behind the&nbsp;government request that Twitter delay scheduled maintenance during a&nbsp;critical period for&nbsp;street protests in&nbsp;Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/08/566/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft cries foul on&#160;Yahoo!-Google Japan deal</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/04/522/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/04/522/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft will try&#160;to stop Yahoo! from hooking up&#160;with Google in&#160;Japan.
Bing daddy Microsoft told The&#160;Reg it&#160;will object to&#160;Yahoo! Japan&#8217;s alliance with Google, announced this week, in&#160;a presentation to&#160;Japan&#8217;s Fair Trade Commission.
A Microsoft spokesperson said: &#171;We plan to&#160;present evidence to&#160;the Japanese FTC&#160;explaining why&#160;we believe that this deal is&#160;substantially more harmful to&#160;competition than Google’s deal with Yahoo in&#160;2008 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft will try&nbsp;to stop Yahoo! from hooking up&nbsp;with Google in&nbsp;Japan.<span id="more-522"></span></p>
<p>Bing daddy Microsoft told The&nbsp;Reg it&nbsp;will object to&nbsp;Yahoo! Japan&#8217;s alliance with Google, announced this week, in&nbsp;a presentation to&nbsp;Japan&#8217;s Fair Trade Commission.</p>
<p>A Microsoft spokesperson said: &laquo;We plan to&nbsp;present evidence to&nbsp;the Japanese FTC&nbsp;explaining why&nbsp;we believe that this deal is&nbsp;substantially more harmful to&nbsp;competition than Google’s deal with Yahoo in&nbsp;2008 that the&nbsp;DOJ found to&nbsp;be illegal.&#8221;</p>
<p>Microsoft told All-About-Microsoft&#8217;s Mary-Jo Foley a&nbsp;tie up&nbsp;would give Google virtually 100&nbsp;per cent of&nbsp;all searches in&nbsp;the country and&nbsp;deliver control of&nbsp;all personal searches by&nbsp;consumers and&nbsp;business to&nbsp;the internet&#8217;s biggest search and&nbsp;ads company.</p>
<p>Earlier this week, Yahoo! Japan said it&nbsp;will switch to&nbsp;Google&#8217;s search engine from the&nbsp;one it&nbsp;had developed and&nbsp;would use&nbsp;online advertising and&nbsp;distribution from Google.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a&nbsp;mirror of&nbsp;the agreement between Microsoft and&nbsp;Yahoo! elsewhere in&nbsp;the world, where Yahoo!&#8217;s search and&nbsp;ads platform is&nbsp;being lifted out&nbsp;and Microsoft&#8217;s Bing is&nbsp;being slotted in. The&nbsp;switch-over is&nbsp;due for&nbsp;completion during September and&nbsp;October.</p>
<p>Yahoo! Japan isn&#8217;t a&nbsp;fully owned extension of&nbsp;Yahoo! US. Japanese phone and&nbsp;internet service provider Softbank has&nbsp;a 40&nbsp;per cent stake in&nbsp;the operation with Yahoo! on&nbsp;30 per&nbsp;cent.</p>
<p>Yahoo! Japan has&nbsp;around 50&nbsp;per cent of&nbsp;all searches in&nbsp;Japan, with Google on&nbsp;45 per&nbsp;cent and&nbsp;Microsoft in&nbsp;single digits. <sup>&#174;</sup></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/08/04/522/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo! gains ground on&#160;Google in&#160;the US&#160;</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/26/518/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/26/518/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is&#160;still way&#160;out in&#160;front in&#160;terms of&#160;US search engine market share, but&#160;Yahoo! did&#160;make slight inroads last month.
Google had&#160;65,8 per&#160;cent of&#160;the market, according to&#160;comScore figures, which represented a&#160;0,4 per&#160;cent drop compared to&#160;June. Yahoo! which is&#160;in second place, seems to&#160;have taken that sliver, as&#160;it was&#160;up by&#160;the same amount to&#160;17,1 per&#160;cent.
Bing remains in&#160;third place and&#160;retains the&#160;same percentage of&#160;searchers&#160;&#8212; 11&#160;per [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is&nbsp;still way&nbsp;out in&nbsp;front in&nbsp;terms of&nbsp;US search engine market share, but&nbsp;Yahoo! did&nbsp;make slight inroads last month.<span id="more-518"></span></p>
<p>Google had&nbsp;65,8 per&nbsp;cent of&nbsp;the market, according to&nbsp;comScore figures, which represented a&nbsp;0,4 per&nbsp;cent drop compared to&nbsp;June. Yahoo! which is&nbsp;in second place, seems to&nbsp;have taken that sliver, as&nbsp;it was&nbsp;up by&nbsp;the same amount to&nbsp;17,1 per&nbsp;cent.</p>
<p>Bing remains in&nbsp;third place and&nbsp;retains the&nbsp;same percentage of&nbsp;searchers&nbsp;&#8212; 11&nbsp;per cent. In&nbsp;June, Bing had&nbsp;seen greater growth. It&nbsp;went from 12,1 per&nbsp;cent of&nbsp;the market in&nbsp;May to&nbsp;12,7 per&nbsp;cent in&nbsp;June.</p>
<p>Experian Hitwise figures show a&nbsp;similar overall picture. They have Google with 71,43 per&nbsp;cent, Yahoo! with 14,43 per&nbsp;cent and&nbsp;Bing with 9,86 per&nbsp;cent.</p>
<p>The Experian Hitwise figures are&nbsp;further broken down into different categories and&nbsp;the most interesting figure is&nbsp;perhaps the&nbsp;rise in&nbsp;shopping-related searches on&nbsp;Bing, which has&nbsp;seen an&nbsp;84 per&nbsp;cent increase compared to&nbsp;the same period last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/26/518/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube extends maximum video production length</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/21/479/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/21/479/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Video productions up&#160;to 15&#160;minutes long can&#160;now be&#160;uploaded onto YouTube.
Businesses will now&#160;be able to&#160;upload longer video productions onto YouTube, it&#160;has been announced.
The website has&#160;revealed that it&#160;has increased its&#160;upload limit from ten&#160;to 15&#160;minutes following demand from users.
YouTube said it&#160;was able to&#160;make the&#160;change thanks to&#160;the creation and&#160;improvement of&#160;numerous tools for&#160;content owners, in&#160;particular its&#160;Content ID&#160;content mangement system.
&#171;Now, all&#160;of the&#160;major [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Video productions up&nbsp;to 15&nbsp;minutes long can&nbsp;now be&nbsp;uploaded onto YouTube.<span id="more-479"></span></p>
<p>Businesses will now&nbsp;be able to&nbsp;upload longer video productions onto YouTube, it&nbsp;has been announced.</p>
<p>The website has&nbsp;revealed that it&nbsp;has increased its&nbsp;upload limit from ten&nbsp;to 15&nbsp;minutes following demand from users.</p>
<p>YouTube said it&nbsp;was able to&nbsp;make the&nbsp;change thanks to&nbsp;the creation and&nbsp;improvement of&nbsp;numerous tools for&nbsp;content owners, in&nbsp;particular its&nbsp;Content ID&nbsp;content mangement system.</p>
<p>&laquo;Now, all&nbsp;of the&nbsp;major U.S. movie studios, music labels and&nbsp;over 1,000 other global partners use&nbsp;Content ID&nbsp;to manage their content on&nbsp;YouTube.,&#8221; said a&nbsp;YouTube blog post.</p>
<p>&laquo;Because of&nbsp;the success of&nbsp;these ongoing technological efforts, we&nbsp;are able to&nbsp;increase the&nbsp;upload limit today.&#8221;</p>
<p>To launch the&nbsp;new service, YouTube is&nbsp;running a&nbsp;competition in&nbsp;which users can&nbsp;enter a&nbsp;15-minute video on&nbsp;the theme 15&nbsp;Minutes of&nbsp;Fame.</p>
<p>Selected videos will be&nbsp;shown on&nbsp;the YouTube homepage.</p>
<p>Earlier this month, YouTube users were encouraged to&nbsp;submit videos to&nbsp;be made into a&nbsp;documentary by&nbsp;Ridley Scott and&nbsp;Kevin Macdonald entitle Life in&nbsp;a Day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/21/479/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook brings privacy controls to&#160;your phone</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/20/475/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/20/475/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After facing much criticism over privacy concerns, Facebook is&#160;beefing up&#160;how users can&#160;control their information. It’s not&#160;just desktops though, as&#160;the world’s largest social network is&#160;bringing privacy controls to&#160;your handset.
On its&#160;blog, the&#160;company explained:
    You&#160;can get&#160;to privacy controls on&#160;mobile by&#160;going to&#160;m.facebook.com/privacy or&#160;by going to&#160;the Settings page and&#160;clicking the&#160;&#171;Change&#187; link next to&#160;the words &#171;Privacy Settings.&#187; Check [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After facing much criticism over privacy concerns, Facebook is&nbsp;beefing up&nbsp;how users can&nbsp;control their information. It’s not&nbsp;just desktops though, as&nbsp;the world’s largest social network is&nbsp;bringing privacy controls to&nbsp;your handset.<span id="more-475"></span></p>
<p>On its&nbsp;blog, the&nbsp;company explained:</p>
<p>    You&nbsp;can get&nbsp;to privacy controls on&nbsp;mobile by&nbsp;going to&nbsp;m.facebook.com/privacy or&nbsp;by going to&nbsp;the Settings page and&nbsp;clicking the&nbsp;&laquo;Change&raquo; link next to&nbsp;the words &laquo;Privacy Settings.&raquo; Check it&nbsp;out for&nbsp;yourself to:</p>
<p>    * Select who&nbsp;can see&nbsp;the content you&nbsp;post by&nbsp;setting the&nbsp;simple control for&nbsp;sharing on&nbsp;Facebook to&nbsp;friends, friends of&nbsp;friends or&nbsp;everyone,</p>
<p>    * Fully customize your granular settings, if&nbsp;you want, and&nbsp;have them take effect instantly, and</p>
<p>    * Read through our&nbsp;comprehensive privacy guide, formatted for&nbsp;mobile devices.</p>
<p>It’s a&nbsp;good move for&nbsp;Facebook to&nbsp;bring these privacy controls to&nbsp;handsets because the&nbsp;company knows that mobile is&nbsp;their future. I&nbsp;do think the&nbsp;privacy flap was&nbsp;a bit&nbsp;overblown and&nbsp;amplified by&nbsp;a vocal minority but&nbsp;it’s a&nbsp;real issue that could really hamper the&nbsp;company’s ambitions.</p>
<p>What are&nbsp;those ambitions? It’s simple really: they want to&nbsp;remake the&nbsp;web. Instead of&nbsp;going to&nbsp;Google to&nbsp;find out&nbsp;what you&nbsp;want, the&nbsp;company wants your friends (and its&nbsp;advertisers) to&nbsp;influence your Internet experiences and&nbsp;decisions.</p>
<p>This could be&nbsp;incredibly powerful on&nbsp;the mobile side of&nbsp;things because the&nbsp;company wants to&nbsp;become a&nbsp;platform that influences other phones, apps and&nbsp;even app&nbsp;stores. We&nbsp;all know location-based services are&nbsp;coming in&nbsp;a big&nbsp;way, but&nbsp;the check-in model seems kind of&nbsp;limited and&nbsp;geo-fencing coupons can&nbsp;still be&nbsp;spam-like.</p>
<p>If you&nbsp;implement a&nbsp;strong social-networking layer like Facebook, these location-based services could become more useful. If&nbsp;I walk by&nbsp;a deli which has&nbsp;received praise from many of&nbsp;my Facebook friends, a&nbsp;mobile coupon from there would be&nbsp;more useful than just a&nbsp;random store that senses I’m nearby and&nbsp;shoots me&nbsp;a discount.</p>
<p>I could go&nbsp;on and&nbsp;on about Facebook, privacy and&nbsp;mobile, but&nbsp;I want to&nbsp;hear your thoughts in&nbsp;the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/20/475/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo&#8217;s second-quarter lobbying bill rises 15&#160;pct</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/13/453/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/13/453/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo Inc. spent $550,000 in&#160;the second quarter on&#160;a lobbying agenda that touched upon issues ranging from the&#160;Internet company&#8217;s search partnership with Microsoft Corp. to&#160;the financial pressures facing journalism because of&#160;Internet competition.
The bill for&#160;the April-June period represented a&#160;15 percent increase from the&#160;$480,000 that lobbying cost Yahoo at&#160;the same time last year.
The latest quarter marks Yahoo&#8217;s highest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo Inc. spent $550,000 in&nbsp;the second quarter on&nbsp;a lobbying agenda that touched upon issues ranging from the&nbsp;Internet company&#8217;s search partnership with Microsoft Corp. to&nbsp;the financial pressures facing journalism because of&nbsp;Internet competition.<span id="more-453"></span></p>
<p>The bill for&nbsp;the April-June period represented a&nbsp;15 percent increase from the&nbsp;$480,000 that lobbying cost Yahoo at&nbsp;the same time last year.</p>
<p>The latest quarter marks Yahoo&#8217;s highest lobbying tab&nbsp;for a&nbsp;three-month period since the&nbsp;third quarter of&nbsp;2008 when it&nbsp;spent $570,000.</p>
<p>With its&nbsp;revenue barely growing, Yahoo has&nbsp;been funneling less money into political persuasion than some of&nbsp;its biggest rivals. Microsoft&#8217;s second-quarter lobbying expenses totaled $1,85 million while Google paid out&nbsp;$1,34 million.</p>
<p>Some of&nbsp;Yahoo&#8217;s concerns overlapped with its&nbsp;rivals. Those topics included online privacy, Internet advertising and&nbsp;human rights.</p>
<p>The company, based in&nbsp;Sunnyvale, also addressed proposed legislation affecting Internet security, child protection, corporate governance, executive compensation and&nbsp;shareholder rights, according to&nbsp;a disclosure statement filed Tuesday with the&nbsp;House of&nbsp;Representatives&#8217; clerk&#8217;s office.</p>
<p>Yahoo also lobbied against a&nbsp;proposed legal settlement that would give Google the&nbsp;digital rights to&nbsp;millions of&nbsp;out-of-print books. Microsoft and&nbsp;Amazon.com Inc. are&nbsp;among the&nbsp;other companies aligned against the&nbsp;Google books deal, which still needs approval from a&nbsp;federal judge.</p>
<p>The various lobbying efforts were directed at&nbsp;Congress, the&nbsp;office of&nbsp;the president, the&nbsp;Federal Trade Commission, the&nbsp;U.S. Department of&nbsp;Commerce, the&nbsp;U.S. Department of&nbsp;State, the&nbsp;Federal Communications Commission, the&nbsp;U.S. Food and&nbsp;Drug Administration, the&nbsp;U.S. Patent &#038; Trademark Office, the&nbsp;Securities and&nbsp;Exchange Commission and&nbsp;the U.S Trade Representatives.</p>
<p>Among those registered to&nbsp;lobby for&nbsp;Yahoo were: Leslie Dunlap, who&nbsp;once worked in&nbsp;the 1990s for&nbsp;former Congressman J. Dennis Hastert before he&nbsp;became speaker of&nbsp;the House; and&nbsp;David Hantman, former chief of&nbsp;staff for&nbsp;Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/13/453/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Commands 66% Search Share over Yahoo, Bing</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/06/411/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/06/411/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google held its&#160;66 percent U.S. market share through June. Yahoo and&#160;Microsoft Bing notched 16,7 percent and&#160;11 percent, according to&#160;adjusted numbers from comScore. Financial analysts question comScore&#8217;s search metrics.
Google retained its&#160;66 percent U.S. market share through June, while Yahoo and&#160;Microsoft Bing notched 16,7 percent and&#160;11 percent, respectively, according to&#160;adjusted numbers from market researcher comScore.
Search share didn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google held its&nbsp;66 percent U.S. market share through June. Yahoo and&nbsp;Microsoft Bing notched 16,7 percent and&nbsp;11 percent, according to&nbsp;adjusted numbers from comScore. Financial analysts question comScore&#8217;s search metrics.<span id="more-411"></span></p>
<p>Google retained its&nbsp;66 percent U.S. market share through June, while Yahoo and&nbsp;Microsoft Bing notched 16,7 percent and&nbsp;11 percent, respectively, according to&nbsp;adjusted numbers from market researcher comScore.</p>
<p>Search share didn&#8217;t change much when comScore July 12&nbsp;stripped away &laquo;contextually-driven searches&raquo; powered by&nbsp;slideshows and&nbsp;contextual shortcuts on&nbsp;Yahoo and&nbsp;Bing.</p>
<p>Google slipped a&nbsp;touch from 66,4 percent through May&nbsp;to 66,2 percent through June. Yahoo nudged up&nbsp;from 16,6 percent and&nbsp;Bing grew from 10,8 percent. HitWise also had&nbsp;Bing gaining for&nbsp;June, albeit to&nbsp;only 9,85 percent.</p>
<p>However, when comScore counts the&nbsp;slideshows and&nbsp;other shortcuts, which trigger automatic searches instead of&nbsp;actual physical clicks by&nbsp;users, the&nbsp;numbers tell a&nbsp;different story.</p>
<p>Viewed through that lens, Google lost share, going from 63,7 percent in&nbsp;May to&nbsp;62,6 percent in&nbsp;June. Yahoo leapt up&nbsp;to 18,9 percent in&nbsp;June from 18,3 percent the&nbsp;month earlier. Bing jumped from 12,1 percent in&nbsp;May to&nbsp;12,7 percent in&nbsp;June.</p>
<p>Accounting for&nbsp;automated search queries, it&nbsp;doesn&#8217;t look like anything will stop Yahoo or&nbsp;Bing from chomping share from Google. That is, of&nbsp;course, unless  Google begins offering slideshows and&nbsp;other shortcut links.</p>
<p>There is&nbsp;no indication from Mountain View, Calif., that will happen. Moreover, comScore&#8217;s adjusted figures are&nbsp;the numbers that most financial analysts are&nbsp;looking at&nbsp;when they assess the&nbsp;U.S. search sector.</p>
<p>Marianne Wolk, of&nbsp;Susquehanna Financial Group, noted as&nbsp;much in&nbsp;her research note July 13:</p>
<p>&laquo;We prefer to&nbsp;examine Google&#8217;s share of&nbsp;adjusted core searches, which strips out&nbsp;the incremental volumes associated with contextual searches from slideshows, etc., recently included with Yahoo and&nbsp;Microsoft&#8217;s results.&#8221;</p>
<p>Jefferies and&nbsp;Co. analyst Youssel Squali joined Wolk in&nbsp;this sentiment, calling Google one&nbsp;of the&nbsp;best plays on&nbsp;ad recovery and&nbsp;a &laquo;must buy&raquo; for&nbsp;advertisers. He&nbsp;added:</p>
<p>&laquo;While comScore data suggests that Google lost 110&nbsp;basis points (bps) m/m (month-over-month) in&nbsp;June and&nbsp;Yahoo and&nbsp;Bing gained 60bps each, we&nbsp;believe most of&nbsp;Yahoo and&nbsp;Bing&#8217;s gains came from cosmetic changes. Adjusting for&nbsp;these, Google lost only 20bps m/m.&#8221;</p>
<p>Finally, FBR&nbsp;Capital Markets analysts chimed in:</p>
<p>&laquo;comScore June data needs some adjusting. While comScore&#8217;s reported numbers may&nbsp;cause some confusion by&nbsp;suggesting that GOOG lost 110&nbsp;bps m/m in&nbsp;June and&nbsp;Yahoo! and&nbsp;Bing gained 60&nbsp;bps each, we&nbsp;believe that most of&nbsp;Yahoo&#8217;s and&nbsp;Bing&#8217;s gains came from incorporating automatic searches in&nbsp;slideshow navigation and&nbsp;in-text links.&#8221;</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t a&nbsp;case of&nbsp;financial analysts unjustly ganging up&nbsp;on comScore; the&nbsp;research firm said in&nbsp;June it&nbsp;is altering its&nbsp;methodology for&nbsp;classifying and&nbsp;counting Web&nbsp;searches.</p>
<p>The research firm expects to&nbsp;employ them in&nbsp;time for&nbsp;its July data, slated for&nbsp;a mid-August release.</p>
<p>That may&nbsp;mean more good news for&nbsp;Google, FBR&nbsp;noted: &laquo;comScore appears to&nbsp;be finalizing the&nbsp;restructured measurement this week and&nbsp;should be&nbsp;on plan to&nbsp;provide more relevant search figures starting in&nbsp;3Q. We&nbsp;believe this will ultimately benefit Google&#8217;s reported share figures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/07/06/411/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More than 16 billion minutes spent on Facebook per day</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/06/02/378/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/06/02/378/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[users]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than 400&#160;million active users spend a&#160;total of&#160;more than 16&#160;billion minutes on&#160;social networking site Facebook per&#160;day, says Facebook VP&#160;of Technical Operations Jonathan Heiliger. Heiliger was&#160;giving a&#160;presentation on&#160;the infrastructure of&#160;one of&#160;the world&#8217;s most trafficked sites at&#160;the Velocity 2010 conference last week when he&#160;revealed the&#160;figures.
Other interesting facts: 3&#160;billion photos are&#160;uploaded to&#160;Facebook each month, of&#160;which users view more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than 400&nbsp;million active users spend a&nbsp;total of&nbsp;more than 16&nbsp;billion minutes on&nbsp;social networking site Facebook per&nbsp;day, says Facebook VP&nbsp;of Technical Operations Jonathan Heiliger. Heiliger was&nbsp;giving a&nbsp;presentation on&nbsp;the infrastructure of&nbsp;one of&nbsp;the world&#8217;s most trafficked sites at&nbsp;the Velocity 2010 conference last week when he&nbsp;revealed the&nbsp;figures.<span id="more-378"></span></p>
<p>Other interesting facts: 3&nbsp;billion photos are&nbsp;uploaded to&nbsp;Facebook each month, of&nbsp;which users view more than 1&nbsp;million photos of&nbsp;every second. In&nbsp;order to&nbsp;support this enormous volume of&nbsp;pageviews and&nbsp;updates, Facebook&#8217;s servers perform more than 50&nbsp;million operations per&nbsp;second. While nothing was&nbsp;said on&nbsp;the number of&nbsp;servers that are&nbsp;actually deployed, Rich Miller of&nbsp;Data Center Knowledge spotted a&nbsp;PowerPoint slide showing the&nbsp;server footprint of&nbsp;Facebook over the&nbsp;years.</p>
<p>Using previously confirmed figures, Miller did&nbsp;a simple extrapolation and&nbsp;estimated that Facebook now&nbsp;has 60,000 or&nbsp;more servers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/06/02/378/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Micro Express Microflex 88B</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/05/28/354/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/05/28/354/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 21:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micro Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microflex 88B]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The raw&#160;performance of&#160;the Micro Express Microflex 88B&#160;desktop is&#160;admirable, and&#160;the system&#8217;s price of&#160;$1299 price (as of&#160;June 7, 2010) is&#160;quite reasonable for&#160;the category. But&#160;competing systems on&#160;PCWorld&#8217;s Top&#160;10 Performance Desktop PCs&#160;chart trump it&#160;on general performance and&#160;on gaming-test frame rates. Nevertheless, PCs&#160;that deliver the&#160;Microflex 88B&#8217;s performance numbers at&#160;its price and&#160;with the&#160;array of&#160;next-generation connection options that it&#160;offers are&#160;hard to&#160;find.
The 88B&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The raw&nbsp;performance of&nbsp;the Micro Express Microflex 88B&nbsp;desktop is&nbsp;admirable, and&nbsp;the system&#8217;s price of&nbsp;$1299 price (as of&nbsp;June 7, 2010) is&nbsp;quite reasonable for&nbsp;the category. But&nbsp;competing systems on&nbsp;PCWorld&#8217;s Top&nbsp;10 Performance Desktop PCs&nbsp;chart trump it&nbsp;on general performance and&nbsp;on gaming-test frame rates. Nevertheless, PCs&nbsp;that deliver the&nbsp;Microflex 88B&#8217;s performance numbers at&nbsp;its price and&nbsp;with the&nbsp;array of&nbsp;next-generation connection options that it&nbsp;offers are&nbsp;hard to&nbsp;find.<span id="more-354"></span></p>
<p>The 88B&#8217;s 3,06GHz Intel Core i7&nbsp;880 processor outpaces competing PCs&nbsp;that stick with slower-clocked CPUs-but not&nbsp;by a&nbsp;lot. Of&nbsp;course, the&nbsp;machine&#8217;s general performance undoubtedly reflects the&nbsp;heavy load it&nbsp;bears: 4GB&nbsp;of DDR3 memory, a&nbsp;60GB solid-state drive for&nbsp;booting, and&nbsp;a 500GB hard-disk drive for&nbsp;storage. The&nbsp;88B turned a&nbsp;score of&nbsp;156 on&nbsp;our WorldBench 6&nbsp;test suite-10 points higher than the&nbsp;mark of&nbsp;146 earned by&nbsp;the HP&nbsp;Pavilion HPE-170t, which offers a&nbsp;2,80GHz Core i7&nbsp;860 processor and&nbsp;8GB of&nbsp;DDR3 memory for&nbsp;just over $1400.</p>
<p>The 88B&#8217;s ATI&nbsp;Radeon HD5770 graphics board helps the&nbsp;system reach an&nbsp;average frame rate of&nbsp;68,5 frames per&nbsp;second on&nbsp;our Unreal Tournament 3&nbsp;benchmark run&nbsp;(tested at&nbsp;2560 by&nbsp;1600 resolution, at&nbsp;high quality). That&#8217;s not&nbsp;the best score on&nbsp;the charts, but&nbsp;it beats the&nbsp;HPE-170t&#8217;s average of&nbsp;65,4 fps.</p>
<p>Where next-generation connectivity is&nbsp;concerned, the&nbsp;Microflex 88B&nbsp;shines. The&nbsp;front of&nbsp;the case offers three USB&nbsp;ports, a&nbsp;FireWire 400&nbsp;port, and&nbsp;a multiformat card reader. On&nbsp;the rear of&nbsp;the system, you&#8217;ll find eight USB&nbsp;ports, two&nbsp;USB 3,0 ports, two&nbsp;eSATA ports, two&nbsp;Firewire 400&nbsp;ports (one mini), two&nbsp;gigabit ethernet ports, SPDIF out, and&nbsp;integrated 7,1 surround sound. The&nbsp;video card offers two&nbsp;DVI connectors, one&nbsp;HDMI connector, and&nbsp;one DisplayPort connector. Few&nbsp;machines in&nbsp;the Performance PC&nbsp;category have begun to&nbsp;offer USB&nbsp;3,0 (Polywell&#8217;s Poly X5800A3 is&nbsp;another example), and&nbsp;its presence is&nbsp;sure to&nbsp;appeal to&nbsp;users in&nbsp;need of&nbsp;high-speed interfaces.</p>
<p>Though the&nbsp;system&#8217;s internal wiring takes up&nbsp;some space, it&#8217;s relatively neat. Better yet, the&nbsp;chassis&#8217;s four free 5,25-inch drive bays and&nbsp;one free 3,5-inch bay&nbsp;come with screwless locking mechanisms preinstalled. Should you&nbsp;want to&nbsp;replace the&nbsp;system&#8217;s combined Blu-ray reader/DVD burner, you&#8217;ll be&nbsp;able to&nbsp;slide in&nbsp;and secure a&nbsp;new component in&nbsp;a matter of&nbsp;seconds.</p>
<p>In contrast, the&nbsp;system&#8217;s free PCI&nbsp;Express x4&nbsp;slots (two), PCI&nbsp;slots (two), and&nbsp;PCI Express x16&nbsp;slot (one) all&nbsp;use screws to&nbsp;lock in&nbsp;additional cards.We can&#8217;t complain about the&nbsp;upgradability, however: Should you&nbsp;want to&nbsp;fire up&nbsp;a CrossFire setup to&nbsp;boost the&nbsp;88B&#8217;s gaming capabilities, you&#8217;re free to&nbsp;do so.</p>
<p>The mouse that ships with the&nbsp;88B is&nbsp;drab and&nbsp;generic,. but&nbsp;the Microsoft-branded keyboard comes with a&nbsp;substantial number of&nbsp;extra buttons for&nbsp;one-touch application launching, volume adjustments, media playback control, and&nbsp;zooming.</p>
<p>You can&nbsp;find faster systems than the&nbsp;88B, and&nbsp;you can&nbsp;find better gaming rigs than the&nbsp;Microflex 88B&nbsp;(the aforementioned Polywell PolyX5800A3, for&nbsp;instance, or&nbsp;the CyberPower Black Pearl). But&nbsp;the 88B&#8217;s combination of&nbsp;performance, gaming smarts, and&nbsp;low price, plus wide-ranging connection options, may&nbsp;be unique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/05/28/354/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter to&#160;settle FTC&#160;charges on&#160;data security</title>
		<link>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/05/27/350/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/05/27/350/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 21:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vika</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digicomgroup.com/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US regulator FTC&#160;and Twitter have agreed to&#160;settle charges that the&#160;micro-blogging site failed to&#160;safeguard personal information of&#160;millions of&#160;its users.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which mainly looks into anti-competitive practices, had&#160;accused Twitter of&#160;&#171;serious lapses&#187; in&#160;its data security that allowed hackers to&#160;access non-public user information, among other things.
In a&#160;statement on&#160;Thursday, the&#160;FTC said Twitter has&#160;agreed to&#160;settle charges that it&#160;deceived [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US regulator FTC&nbsp;and Twitter have agreed to&nbsp;settle charges that the&nbsp;micro-blogging site failed to&nbsp;safeguard personal information of&nbsp;millions of&nbsp;its users.<span id="more-350"></span></p>
<p>The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which mainly looks into anti-competitive practices, had&nbsp;accused Twitter of&nbsp;&laquo;serious lapses&raquo; in&nbsp;its data security that allowed hackers to&nbsp;access non-public user information, among other things.</p>
<p>In a&nbsp;statement on&nbsp;Thursday, the&nbsp;FTC said Twitter has&nbsp;agreed to&nbsp;settle charges that it&nbsp;deceived consumers and&nbsp;put their privacy at&nbsp;risk by&nbsp;failing to&nbsp;safeguard their personal information.</p>
<p>According to&nbsp;the regulator, the&nbsp;security lapses resulted in&nbsp;hackers sending out&nbsp;phony tweets from Twitter accounts of&nbsp;Barack Obama and&nbsp;Fox News.</p>
<p>As per&nbsp;the FTC&nbsp;complaint, hackers gained administrative control of&nbsp;Twitter twice between January and&nbsp;May, 2009.</p>
<p>&laquo;One tweet was&nbsp;sent from the&nbsp;account of&nbsp;then President-elect Barack Obama, offering his&nbsp;more than 150,000 followers a&nbsp;chance to&nbsp;win $ 500&nbsp;in free gasoline. At&nbsp;least one&nbsp;phony tweet was&nbsp;sent from the&nbsp;account of&nbsp;Fox News,&#8221; the&nbsp;statement said.</p>
<p>Going by&nbsp;estimates, Twitter has&nbsp;over 75&nbsp;million users worldwide.</p>
<p>As part of&nbsp;the settlement, Twitter must establish and&nbsp;maintain a&nbsp;comprehensive information security programme, which will be&nbsp;assessed by&nbsp;an independent auditor every other year for&nbsp;10 years, the&nbsp;FTC noted. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digicomgroup.com/2010/05/27/350/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
